12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

240 Travaux préparatoires: United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized CrimeConvention as the basis for mutual law enforcement cooperation in respect <strong>of</strong> any<strong>of</strong>fence covered by <strong>this</strong> Convention. Whenever appropriate, States Parties shall makefull use <strong>of</strong> agreements or arrangements, including international or regional organizations,to enhance the cooperation between their law enforcement agencies.“2. States Parties shall cooperate closely with one another, consistent with theirrespective domestic legal and administrative systems, to enhance the effectiveness <strong>of</strong>law enforcement action to combat the <strong>of</strong>fences established in article(s) [...] <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong>Convention [alternatively: the <strong>of</strong>fences covered by <strong>this</strong> Convention]. Each State Partyshall, in particular, adopt effective measures:“(a) To enhance and, where necessary, to establish channels <strong>of</strong> communicationbetween their competent authorities, agencies and services, including the designation,where appropriate, <strong>of</strong> [a central authority or authorities], 16 to facilitate the secure andrapid exchange <strong>of</strong> information concerning all aspects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fences established in<strong>this</strong> Convention, including, if the States Parties concerned deem it appropriate, linkswith other criminal activities; 17“(b) To cooperate with other State Parties in conducting inquiries, with respectto <strong>of</strong>fences established in <strong>this</strong> Convention, concerning:“(i) The identity, whereabouts and activities <strong>of</strong> persons suspected <strong>of</strong> involvementin the <strong>of</strong>fences established in <strong>this</strong> Convention;“(ii) The movement <strong>of</strong> proceeds or property derived from the commission <strong>of</strong>such <strong>of</strong>fences;“(iii) The movement <strong>of</strong> instrumentalities 18 used or intended for use in the commission<strong>of</strong> such <strong>of</strong>fences; 19“(c) In appropriate cases and if not contrary to domestic law, to establish jointteams, taking into account the need to protect the security <strong>of</strong> persons and operations,in order to carry out the provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> paragraph. Officials <strong>of</strong> any State Partyparticipating in such teams shall act as authorized by the appropriate authorities <strong>of</strong>the Party in whose territory the operation is to take place; in all such cases, the StatesParties involved shall ensure that the sovereignty <strong>of</strong> the Party in whose territory theoperation is to take place is fully respected;“(d) To provide, when appropriate, necessary items or quantities <strong>of</strong> substancesfor analytical or investigative purposes;“(e) To facilitate effective coordination between their competent agencies andservices and to promote the exchange <strong>of</strong> personnel and other experts, including, subjectto bilateral arrangements or agreements between the States Parties concerned, theposting <strong>of</strong> liaison <strong>of</strong>ficers;16As indicated above, many delegations were <strong>of</strong> the view that the reference to central authorities should be deleted orplaced in square brackets, as the concept more properly belonged under mutual legal assistance (article 14). In <strong>this</strong> connection,it was noted that the provision <strong>of</strong> the 1988 Convention, on which article 19 was based, did not include a reference tocentral authorities. At the fifth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, the proposal to replace <strong>this</strong> phrase with “points <strong>of</strong> contactamong such authorities, agencies and services” received widespread support. Spain stated that the deletion <strong>of</strong> the referenceto central authorities and its replacement with a reference to the establishment <strong>of</strong> contact points needed further studyby the Ad Hoc Committee.17At the fifth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, the Islamic Republic <strong>of</strong> Iran and Pakistan suggested either deletingthe reference to “links with other criminal activities” or limiting the reference to “other organized criminal activities”.18At the fifth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, the Syrian Arab Republic questioned the use <strong>of</strong> the term “instrumentalities”in <strong>this</strong> connection.19At the fifth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, the Comoros, Mali and Senegal questioned the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the French<strong>version</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> paragraph.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!