12.07.2015 Views

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

View/save PDF version of this document - La Strada International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Article 4.Scope <strong>of</strong> applicationA. Negotiation textsRolling text (A/AC.254/4/Add.1/Rev.1)Fourth session: 28 June-9 July 1999“Article 5“Scope <strong>of</strong> application“1. This Protocol applies to the smuggling <strong>of</strong> migrants when committed in thecontext <strong>of</strong> organized crime as defined in article 2 <strong>of</strong> the Convention. 1“2. The provisions <strong>of</strong> <strong>this</strong> Protocol shall be without prejudice to the obligations<strong>of</strong> States Parties under the 1951 Convention 2 and the 1967 Protocol 3 relating tothe Status <strong>of</strong> Refugees.”Notes by the Secretariat1. At the fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, some delegations suggested theinclusion in article 5 <strong>of</strong> a saving clause similar to that contained in article 15 <strong>of</strong> the drafttrafficking in persons protocol. (See, for example, the proposal <strong>of</strong> Belgium, contained in<strong>document</strong> A/AC.254/L.35; see also the note submitted subsequently, during the eighth session<strong>of</strong> the Ad Hoc Committee, by the Office <strong>of</strong> the United Nations High Commissionerfor Human Rights, the Office <strong>of</strong> the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, theUnited Nations Children’s Fund and the <strong>International</strong> Organization for Migration containedin <strong>document</strong> A/AC.254/27 and Corr.1, para. 17). Other delegations recommended placingsuch a saving clause at the end <strong>of</strong> the protocol. Morocco suggested including the principle<strong>of</strong> non-refoulement in article 4 (see A/AC.254/L.60). That delegation recalled that referenceto humanitarian law was necessary. In the same context, the Office <strong>of</strong> the UnitedNations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Office <strong>of</strong> the United Nations HighCommissioner for Refugees, the United Nations Children’s Fund and the <strong>International</strong>Organization for Migration characterized the principle <strong>of</strong> non-refoulement as the core <strong>of</strong>international refugee protection and strongly advocated the inclusion <strong>of</strong> a provision to theeffect that illegality <strong>of</strong> entrance into a State would not adversely affect a person’s claimfor asylum. It was further suggested that, in order to make such a provision effective,States parties should be required to ensure that smuggled migrants were given full oppor-1It was considered that <strong>this</strong> article will need to be reviewed in the light <strong>of</strong> choices made with regard to options thatappeared later in the text. In addition, the article would need to be reviewed to ensure its consistency with the convention.2United Nations, Treaty Series, vol. 189, No. 2545.3Ibid., vol. 606, No. 8791.471

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!