24.03.2013 Views

o-TOLUIDINE CAS N°: 95-53-4 - UNEP Chemicals

o-TOLUIDINE CAS N°: 95-53-4 - UNEP Chemicals

o-TOLUIDINE CAS N°: 95-53-4 - UNEP Chemicals

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OECD SIDS o-<strong>TOLUIDINE</strong><br />

3. ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND PATHWAYS ID: <strong>95</strong>-<strong>53</strong>-4<br />

DATE: 07.01.2005<br />

were (Elbe in Dresden, Germany = 1):<br />

- Bilina, tributary of the Elbe in the Czech Republic: 4-6<br />

- Elbe in the Czech Republic: 2-3<br />

- Elbe in Dresden, Germany: 1<br />

The authors assumed that the irregular occurence and concentration<br />

pattern of these amines indicated a significant input of untreated<br />

wastewater from batch production in chemical factories in the Czech<br />

Republic. Several samples taken from river sites in Saxony demonstrated<br />

that no significant input of aromatic amines occured in Germany.<br />

Reliability : (2) valid with restrictions<br />

Basic data given<br />

Flag : Critical study for SIDS endpoint<br />

08.06.2004 (52)<br />

Type of measurement : concentration at contaminated site<br />

Media : surface water<br />

Concentration :<br />

Method : Solid Phase Extraction, followed by HPLC<br />

Remark : Boernick et al. (2001) refer to Boernick (1998)<br />

Result : In 1994-1996, o-toluidine was monitored in the Elbe and some of its<br />

tributaries in Germany and the Czech Republic (Boernick, 1998). With a<br />

detection limit of 28 ng/l, o-toluidine was detected in the following waters:<br />

· Bilina river, vicinity of the confluent with the river Elbe in Usti (Aussig,<br />

Czech Republic), but downstream of the wastewater outlet of an azo dye<br />

producer, in 1 out of 7 samples: >21,200 ng/l (value out of the calibration<br />

range). o-Toluidine was not detected upstream of this outlet<br />

· Elbe in Czech Republic, 2 sampling sites downstream confluent with<br />

Bilina, in 2 out of 6 samples: 30 and 1,130 ng/l, respectively. o-Toluidine<br />

was not detected upstream of the confluent of Elbe and Bilina<br />

· Elbe, Pillnitz (Saxony, Germany), km 43 from Czech border, in 1 out of 13<br />

samples: 122 ng/l<br />

· Elbe, Dresden (Saxony, Germany), km 55 from Czech border, in 3 out of<br />

56 samples: 93, 110, and 1,010 ng/l<br />

· Other sites in Saxony (Germany), in 3 out of 45 samples: 70, 72, and 191<br />

ng/l.<br />

Reliability : (2) valid with restrictions<br />

Basic data given<br />

Flag : Critical study for SIDS endpoint<br />

08.06.2004 (<strong>53</strong>) (54)<br />

Type of measurement : concentration at contaminated site<br />

Media : surface water<br />

Concentration :<br />

Method : Solid Phase Extraction, followed by GC/MS<br />

Remark : The limit of detection obtained with external calibration is given as 8.6 ng/l<br />

and the limit of determination as 25.4 ng/l (Eppinger 2000).<br />

Result : Between March 1997 and March 1998, 52 random samples were taken<br />

from the river Elbe at Pillnitz (Saxony, Germany; 43 km from Czech<br />

border). o-Toluidine occured in 6 % (3) of the samples with a maximum of<br />

0.04 µg/l and an average of 0.03 µg/l for these 3 samples. Other result<br />

(Eppinger 2000) were:<br />

· Elbe at Kötitz (Saxony, Germany; 73 km from Czech border). o-Toluidine<br />

occurred in 2 of 12 samples (0.064 µg/l and 0.039 µg/l)<br />

· Elbe at Scharfenberg (Saxony, Germany; 76.5 km left side from Czech<br />

border). o-Toluidine occurred in 2 of 13 samples (0.059 µg/l and 0.03 µg/l)<br />

· Elbe at Meißen (Saxony, Germany; 76.5 km right side from Czech<br />

border). o-Toluidine was not detected in 12 samples (LOD: 0.025 µg/l)<br />

· Elbe at Torgau (Saxony, Germany; 1<strong>53</strong> km from Czech border). o-<br />

Toluidine occurred in 1 of 3 samples (0.03 µg/l)<br />

<strong>UNEP</strong> PUBLICATIONS 81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!