Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FY 2011 President’s Request level. The exception is the NCTIR program that has a 4.7 percent decrease, principally due to completion of specialized research and development. This slows growth in this area, which has had increases in the past few years. There is one new construction start requested for the TRU Waste Facilities at LANL. Prior Year unobligated balances of $40.3 million associated primarily with the deferred Radioactive Liquid Waste Treatment Facility project, and an anticipated cost under run in the Nuclear Materials Safeguards and Security Project are proposed for cancellation to offset requirements elsewhere within DOE. The FY 2012 President’s Request reflects an increase of 19.5 percent from the FY 2010 appropriation. Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation Appropriation The request for this appropriation is $2.5 billion, a decrease of 5.1 percent from the FY 2011 President’s Request. The decrease reflects NNSA’s budget strategy was to assure that programs supporting the President’s commitment to lead an international effort to secure all vulnerable nuclear materials around the world in four years are fully funded in the Request: The GTRI efforts related to radiological material, as well as, INMPC efforts related to border crossings and megaports security have been slowed to accommodate accelerated nuclear material lockdown efforts. The request for Fissile Materials Disposition activities decreases as there is no continued funding for the Russian Plutonium Disposition activities. The construction requests for the Waste Solidification Building and the MOX facility decrease by about $130 million from FY 2011 to FY 2012 consistent with project baselines. Prior Year unobligated balances of $30 million associated with the completed Elimination of Weapons Grade Plutonium Production Program are proposed for cancellation to offset requirements elsewhere within DOE. The FY 2012 President’s Request reflects an increase of 19.6 percent from the FY 2010 appropriation. Naval Reactors Appropriation The President’s Request for Naval Reactors is $1.2 billion, an increase of 7.8 percent over the FY 2011 President’s Request. The programs in this appropriation support the U.S. Navy's nuclear fleet, and major new missions for the OHIO Class submarine replacement that will begin procurement in 2019, and refueling of the land-based prototype (located at the Kesselring site in New York), which requires refueling in 2017. Increased funding is also requested for the Spent Fuel Handling Project (SFHP), which will replace the over 50-year old Expended Core Facility (ECF) as the location for naval spent nuclear fuel receipt, inspection, dissection, packaging, and secure dry storage. FY 2012 funding continues the conceptual design for the facility, equipment, and related systems, as well as continued NEPA-related efforts and project oversight (e.g., engineering procurement and construction management). Detailed project engineering and design work will commence in FY 2013 and construction will commence in FY 2015. The FY 2012 President’s Request reflects an increase of 22.1 percent from the FY 2010 appropriation. Office of the Administrator Appropriation This appropriation provides funding for the Federal staff and related support for the NNSA Headquarters and field organizations. The FY 2012 funding request is $450.1 million. The FY 2012 Request provides for a NNSA Federal staff level of 1,859 full time equivalents (1,984 onboard employees, including 56 limited term employees). The increase reflects funding for Federal oversight of the Pit Disassembly and Conversion at the Savannah River Site ($5,000,000; 20 limited-term FTEs); Uranium Processing Facility at Y-12 ($6,750,000; 27 limited-term FTEs); and the Chemistry and Metallurgy Research Replacement Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory ($2,250,000; 9 limited-term FTEs). National Nuclear Security Administration/ Overview Page 8 FY 2012 Congressional Budget
This request is consistent with the DOE/NNSA federal project management improvement initiative. The FY 2012 President’s Request reflects an increase of 7.0 percent from the FY 2010 appropriation. National Nuclear Security Administration/ Overview Page 9 FY 2012 Congressional Budget
Page 1: Department of Energy FY 2012 Congre
Page 6 and 7: Page 2
Page 10 and 11: Outyear Appropriation Summary NNSA
Page 14 and 15: NNSA Summary by Appropriation FY 20
Page 16 and 17: Indirect Costs and Other Items of I
Page 18 and 19: Other Indirect Cost Projections Fac
Page 20 and 21: minimizing the impact to mission. C
Page 26 and 27: Much of the nation’s nuclear expe
Page 28 and 29: Office of the Administrator Office
Page 30 and 31: Office of the Administrator/ Progra
Page 40 and 41: Congressionally Directed Projects F
Page 50 and 51: Outyear Appropriation Summary by Pr
Page 52 and 53: Mission The Weapons Activities appr
Page 54 and 55: to identifying and responding to po
Page 56 and 57: including securing dangerous nuclea
Page 58 and 59: granularity of the costs required t
Page 60 and 61: Department of Energy (DOE) Working
Page 62 and 63:
Outyear Funding Profile by Subprogr
Page 64 and 65:
Benefits The DSW’s four subprogra
Page 66 and 67:
Weapons Dismantlement and Dispositi
Page 68 and 69:
FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 FY 2012 Appr
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Approp Reque
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Stockpile Systems B61 Stockpile Sy
Page 82 and 83:
Stockpile Services Production Supp
Page 84 and 85:
Major Item of Equipment Major Items
Page 86 and 87:
conditions and in extreme environme
Page 88 and 89:
FY 2010 Accomplishments Advanced Ce
Page 90 and 91:
The Science Campaign is planning fu
Page 92 and 93:
(dollars in thousands) FY 2010 Actu
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Capital Operating Expenses and Cons
Page 98 and 99:
unauthorized use) are achieved and
Page 100 and 101:
• Successfully completed and test
Page 102 and 103:
Detailed Justification (dollars in
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Explanation of Funding Changes FY 2
Page 108 and 109:
Page 104
Page 110 and 111:
Campaign and a major goal for Natio
Page 112 and 113:
early FY 2012. Experiments that var
Page 114 and 115:
with 1 MJ of laser energy imploding
Page 116 and 117:
• Met the requirement for January
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
FY 2010 Actual Approp (dollars in t
Page 122 and 123:
Ignition Explanation of Funding Cha
Page 124 and 125:
Page 120
Page 126 and 127:
Benefits The ASC Campaign is compri
Page 128 and 129:
LANL and SNL. Cielo will be more th
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 132
Page 138 and 139:
The Readiness Campaign capabilities
Page 140 and 141:
• Rapid Design Commercial, off-th
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Stockpile Readiness Explanation of
Page 146 and 147:
Page 142
Page 148 and 149:
• Operate and maintain the nuclea
Page 150 and 151:
• Repaired, in collaboration with
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Operations of Facilities Kansas Ci
Page 164 and 165:
Material Recycle and Recovery FY 20
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
07-D-220, Radioactive Liquid Waste
Page 170 and 171:
Page 166
Page 172 and 173:
Phase A: Infrastructure and Site Im
Page 174 and 175:
(dollars in thousands) App ropriati
Page 176 and 177:
Current Total Estimate (dollars in
Page 178 and 179:
Page 174
Page 180 and 181:
2. Design, Construction, and D&D Sc
Page 182 and 183:
The project is being conducted in a
Page 184 and 185:
5. Financial Schedule (dollars in t
Page 186 and 187:
Total Estimated Cost (TEC) 6. Detai
Page 188 and 189:
Page 184
Page 190 and 191:
Project Description 4. Project Desc
Page 192 and 193:
Total Estimated Cost (TEC) 5. Finan
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 192
Page 198 and 199:
3. Baseline and Validation Status T
Page 200 and 201:
Tunnel, and d) perform minor target
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
9. Required D&D Information D&D Inf
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Other Project Cost (OPC) (dollars i
Page 210 and 211:
Current Total Estimate (dollars in
Page 212 and 213:
Page 208
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
will undergo a phased closure, cons
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 216
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
A Fire Water tie-in line to the HEU
Page 226 and 227:
6. Details of Project Cost Estimate
Page 228 and 229:
and available for demolition since
Page 230 and 231:
NNSA’s increased emphasis on proj
Page 232 and 233:
Nuclear Facility (dollars in thousa
Page 234 and 235:
RLUOB Facility 5. Financial Schedul
Page 236 and 237:
App ropriations (dollars in thousan
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
App ropriations (dollars in thousan
Page 242 and 243:
7. Schedule of Appropriation Reques
Page 244 and 245:
Area Gross Square Feet (gsf) TA-55-
Page 246 and 247:
transportation assets to meet shipp
Page 248 and 249:
Secure Transportation Asset Operati
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Mission Capacity Explanation of Fun
Page 254 and 255:
Secure Transportation Asset Program
Page 256 and 257:
Salaries and Benefits Explanation o
Page 258 and 259:
Investigation (FBI), and strengthen
Page 260 and 261:
• Outreach activities continued w
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Nuclear Counterterrorism (Homeland
Page 270 and 271:
Page 266
Page 272 and 273:
FIRP is complementary to the ongoin
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Recapitalization Explanation of Fun
Page 278 and 279:
Page 274
Page 280 and 281:
Energy Modernization and Investment
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Estimates of Security Costs Recover
Page 290 and 291:
Annual Performance Results and Targ
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Explanation of Funding Changes Oper
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
7. Schedule of Appropriation Reques
Page 306 and 307:
Page 302
Page 308 and 309:
The entire NNSA workforce will reco
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Cyber Security (Homeland Security)
Page 314 and 315:
Page 310
Page 316 and 317:
This enterprise would help assure p
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 318
Page 324 and 325:
Page 320
Page 326 and 327:
Page 322
Page 328 and 329:
Page 324
Page 330 and 331:
FY 2010 Appropriation FY 2010 Budge
Page 332 and 333:
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY
Page 334 and 335:
The Nuclear Detonation Detection (N
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
The Nuclear Safeguards and Security
Page 344 and 345:
• Engaged thousands of technical
Page 346 and 347:
Subprogram Subprogram Activity FY 2
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Nuclear Safeguards and Security Exp
Page 360 and 361:
Page 356
Page 362 and 363:
In February 2005, the Bratislava In
Page 364 and 365:
Major Outyear Priorities and Assump
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Navy Complex Explanation of Funding
Page 374 and 375:
Page 370
Page 376 and 377:
Crosscutting and Technical Support
Page 378 and 379:
Explanation of Funding Changes Zhel
Page 380 and 381:
Page 376
Page 382 and 383:
Preparation (PuP) project into a si
Page 384 and 385:
Detailed Justification FY 2010 Actu
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Explanation of Funding Changes U.S.
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 390
Page 396 and 397:
additional alternatives for disposi
Page 398 and 399:
operations and from other selected
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
6. Details of Project Cost Estimate
Page 404 and 405:
9. Required D&D Information Area Sq
Page 406 and 407:
CD-0 a CD-1 2. Design, Construction
Page 408 and 409:
FY 2011 and FY 2012 Description of
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
FY 2008 FY 2009 Performance Baselin
Page 414 and 415:
Page 410
Page 416 and 417:
Review Team (IRT), comprised of sub
Page 418 and 419:
4. Project Description, Justificati
Page 420 and 421:
5. Financial Schedule (dollars in t
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
8. Related Operations and Maintenan
Page 426 and 427:
Outyear Funding Profile by Subprogr
Page 428 and 429:
vital to GTRI’s mission because i
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 432
Page 438 and 439:
Page 434
Page 440 and 441:
Page 436
Page 442 and 443:
FY 2010 Budget Execution PY Balance
Page 444 and 445:
affect the operational availability
Page 446 and 447:
Major Outyear Priorities and Assump
Page 448 and 449:
Detailed Justification FY 2010 Actu
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
Page 456 and 457:
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Major Items of Equipment (MIE) (TEC
Page 470 and 471:
The project is being conducted in a
Page 472 and 473:
Other Project Cost (OPC) Current To
Page 474 and 475:
Page 470
Page 476 and 477:
security systems requires upgrading
Page 478 and 479:
Not applicable for PED. 10. Acquisi
Page 480 and 481:
4. Project Description, Justificati
Page 482 and 483:
Page 484 and 485:
9. Required D&D Information Area Sq
Page 486 and 487:
FY 2010 Actual Appropriation FY 201
Page 488 and 489:
ACTIVITIES: Naval Reactors The broa
Page 490 and 491:
OUT-YEAR FUNDING: (dollars in thous
Page 492 and 493:
Readiness in Technical Base and Fac
Page 494 and 495:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: KNOLLS ATOMIC P
Page 496 and 497:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: LAWRENCE LIVERM
Page 498 and 499:
INTRODUCTION: Site Description The
Page 500 and 501:
Engineering Campaign The Engineerin
Page 502 and 503:
or nuclear materials in the U.S. or
Page 504 and 505:
addition, LLNL assists technical an
Page 506 and 507:
Page 508 and 509:
• Advanced Certification: Advance
Page 510 and 511:
Advanced Simulation and Computing (
Page 512 and 513:
focus on improving the efficiency o
Page 514 and 515:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: NEVADA NATIONAL
Page 516 and 517:
NNSA Office of Defense Programs and
Page 518 and 519:
Site Stewardship In FY 2012, Site S
Page 520 and 521:
Page 522 and 523:
the past three years, this strategy
Page 524 and 525:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: SANDIA NATIONAL
Page 526 and 527:
Sandia also conducts operations at
Page 528 and 529:
Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignitio
Page 530 and 531:
Site Stewardship Long Term Stewards
Page 532 and 533:
supports the removal and disposal o
Page 534 and 535:
Page 536 and 537:
Facilities include facilities manag
Page 538 and 539:
at several Russian Enterprises. The
Page 540 and 541:
Page 542 and 543:
highly enriched uranium (HEU) and o
Page 544 and 545:
security program, and an alignment
Page 546 and 547:
INTRODUCTION: Site Description The
Page 548 and 549:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: BROOKHAVEN NATI
Page 550 and 551:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: Chicago Operati
Page 552 and 553:
Congressional Items of Interest: Th
Page 554 and 555:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: OAK RIDGE NATIO
Page 556 and 557:
applications, and tracks global mac
Page 558 and 559:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: PACIFIC NORTHWE
Page 560 and 561:
development mission. The PNNL also
Page 562:
Page 558
show all

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?