Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

3. Baseline and Validation Status
TEC, TEC,
(dollars in thousands)
OPC
Prelim Final TEC, TEC, Except OPC,
Design Design Construction Total D&D D&D OPC, Total TPC
FY 2011 13,684 TBD TBD TBD TBD N/A TBD TBD
FY 2012 14,684 12,700 56,715 84,099 1 5,477 N/A 15,477 99,576
Phase A: Glovebox #1 and Air Dryers
TEC, TEC,
(dollars in thousands)
OPC
Prelim Final TEC, TEC, Except OPC,
Design Design Construction Total D&D D&D OPC, Total TPC
FY 2011 3,700 TBD 15,330 19,030 440 N/A 440 19,470
FY 2012 4,289 1,848 12,448 18,585 443 N/A 443 19,028
Phase B: Glovebox 2, Confinement Doors, and Demo of PF-7 in support of the UPS
(dollars in thousands)
TEC, TEC,
OPC
Prelim Final TEC, TEC, Except OPC,
Design Design Construction Total D&D D&D OPC, Total TPC
FY 2012 5,069 854 11,041 16,964 621 N/A 621 17,585
Phase C: Glovebox 3, Exhaust Stack, UPS, Criticality Alarm System, and Vault Water Tanks
(dollars in thousands)
TEC,
OPC
Prelim Final TEC, TEC, Except OPC,
Design Design Construction Total D&D D&D OPC, Total TPC
FY 2012 5,326 9,998 33,226 4 3,224 14,413 N/A 14,413 6 2,963
4. Project Description, Justification, and Scope
The LANL PF-4 major facility and infrastructure systems are aging and approaching the end of their
service life, and, as a consequence, are beginning to require excessive maintenance. As a result, the
facility is experiencing increased operating costs and reduced system reliability. Compliance with safety
and regulatory requirements is critical to mission essential operations, and thus becoming more costly
and cumbersome to maintain due to the physical conditions of facility support systems and equipment.
This project will enhance safety and enable cost effective operations so that the facility can continue to
support critical Defense Programs missions and activities. The LANL identified 20 subprojects at the
pre-conceptual stage for upgrades and modernization. The subprojects were selected utilizing a riskbased
prioritization process that considered the current condition of the equipment, risk of failure to the
worker, the environment, and the public, and risk of failure to programmatic and facility operations.
During Conceptual Design, the project continued to refine the prioritization method and subprojects.
Defense Program’s Infrastructure Revitalization combined with impacts to available/anticipated funding
has led to development of a phased acquisition strategy for the TRP project. To meet mission need
objectives within the budgetary and strategic context constraints, the TRP project is proposed for
execution as three separate, distinct capital line item projects, TRP Phase I, TRP Phase II, and TRP
Phase III.
Weapons Activities/RTBF/Construction/
11-D-801, TA-55 Reinvestment Project II, LANL Page 177
FY 2012 Congressional Budget