02.08.2013 Views

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

activities for the nuclear security enterprise in time to meet mission requirements. <strong>The</strong> Component<br />

Maturation Framework (CMF), a corollary process to the Predictive Capabilities Framework,<br />

provides a construct for integration across programs and campaigns for maturing technologies and<br />

providing manufacturing capabilities for planned insertion <strong>of</strong> components into LEPs. Components<br />

tracked by the CMF for maturation include neutron generators, gas transfer systems, joint test<br />

assemblies, and other non-nuclear and nuclear components or subsystems required to support the<br />

enduring and transformed stockpile. <strong>The</strong> CMF contributes to the overall process <strong>of</strong> coordination<br />

between Campaigns to facilitate increasing the technology readiness level (TRL) <strong>of</strong> new<br />

technologies from design to successful testing in relevant environments, and aids in preparation<br />

necessary for full scale production.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> engineering science basis for enhanced surveillance and nuclear survivability assessments<br />

depends on aging and relevant changes in material properties data provided by the Dynamic<br />

Materials Properties subprogram <strong>of</strong> the Science Campaign. Along with baseline data for related<br />

tests and analysis methodologies, the Science Campaign input includes margin/uncertainty criteria<br />

and sensitivities <strong>of</strong> performance material properties used to develop aging models and lifetime<br />

assessment tools.<br />

• Integration between the Engineering Campaign and RTBF ensures that the proper investment is<br />

made in experimental, computational, and component manufacturing infrastructure needed to meet<br />

the milestones <strong>of</strong> the Campaign, in support <strong>of</strong> DSW. Examples <strong>of</strong> these facilities include the Test<br />

Capability Revitalization Phase II, the Ion Beam Laboratory, and the Microsystems and Engineering<br />

Sciences Applications facility.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> United States and the United Kingdom enjoy longstanding partnerships in the form <strong>of</strong> Joint<br />

Working Group (JOWOGs). Ongoing programs within each country leverage laboratory efforts to<br />

reduce costs and capitalize on existing synergies. In some instances, collaboration between the two<br />

countries and their laboratories results in Enhanced Collaborations to address specific topics <strong>of</strong><br />

interest.<br />

Annual Performance Results and Targets<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Department</strong> is in the process <strong>of</strong> updating its strategic plan, and has been actively engaging<br />

stakeholders including Congress. <strong>The</strong> draft strategic plan is being released for public comment<br />

concurrent with this budget submission, with the expectation <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial publication this spring. <strong>The</strong><br />

draft plan and <strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> budget are consistent and aligned. Updated measures will be released at a later<br />

date and available at the following link http://www.mbe.doe.gov/budget/12budget/index.htm.<br />

<strong>FY</strong> 2010 Accomplishments<br />

Enhanced Surety<br />

• Completed environmental testing and demonstrated that the transportation attachment device used in<br />

the SafeGuard Transporter successfully survived the normal environments without issues;<br />

• Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) successfully completed bullet number five on the Defense<br />

Programs Getting the Job Done in <strong>FY</strong> 2010 list to “demonstrate technologies required to field an<br />

integrated surety system by September 2010”, approximately three months ahead <strong>of</strong> schedule, by<br />

maturing, to TRL 6, command and control system technologies applicable to a NNSA transportation<br />

application;<br />

Weapons Activities/<br />

Engineering Campaign Page 95<br />

<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Congressional</strong> Budget

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!