Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FUNDING BY PROGRAM: OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY TABLES FY 2010 Actual Appropriation (dollars in thousands) FY 2011 Request FY 2012 Request NNSA Weapons Activities Directed Stockpile Work 15 0 0 Advanced Simulation and Computing Campaign 383 552 0 Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities 3,174 0 0 Nuclear Counterterrorism Incident Response 1,259 1,322 1,388 Site Stewardship 0 1,925 3,000 Subtotal Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 4,831 3,799 4,388 Nonproliferation and Verification R&D 18,450 12,248 13,196 Nonproliferation and International Security 25,324 21,285 22,265 International Nuclear Materials Protection and Cooperation 120,387 129,494 157,339 Fissile Materials Disposition 0 106,700 4,897 Global Threat Reduction Initiative 11,345 17,617 17,496 Subtotal Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 175,506 287,344 215,193 Total, NNSA 180,337 291,143 219,581 OUT-YEAR FUNDING: (dollars in thousands) FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY 2016 NNSA Weapons Activities Nuclear Counterterrorism Incident Response 1,457 1,474 1,489 1,508 Site Stewardship 4,800 4,800 6,780 2,695 Subtotal Weapons Activities Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 6,257 6,274 8,269 4,203 Nonproliferation and Verification Research & Development 13,114 13,498 13,536 14,305 Nonproliferation and International Security 22,251 22,933 23,479 23,889 International Nuclear Materials Protection and Cooperation 115,375 130,540 171,500 136,159 Fissile Materials Disposition 44,850 44,700 49,250 22,600 Global Threat Reduction Initiative 16,907 21,669 22,486 25,183 Subtotal Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation 212,497 233,340 280,251 222,136 Total, NNSA 218,754 239,614 288,520 226,339 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Page 550 FY 2012 Congressional Budget
Congressional Items of Interest: Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation programs at ORNL under the International Nuclear Materials Protection and Cooperation Program and Global Threat Reduction Initiative support the Administration efforts to secure all vulnerable nuclear material around the world within four years. Major Changes or Shifts: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is the lead for the contracts with Russia for the purposes of Russian plutonium disposition. In FY2011, the Fissile Materials Disposition program requested $100 million for the Russian Surplus Plutonium Disposition Program, as the first installment towards a pledge of $400 million that the U.S. Government agreed to for this program in Russia. Further significant funding requests are subject to the establishment of implementation milestones for the amended Plutonium Management and Disposition Agreement objectives. The program anticipates balances from the FY 2011 funds to be available in FY 2012. INTRODUCTION: Site Description The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is not a National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) managed site. The Office of Science is the site landlord for the Department of Energy. However, significant NNSA work is conducted at the site. ACTIVITIES: Site Stewardship In the Site Stewardship program, Nuclear Materials Integration activities consist of the development of project plans for disposition of irradiated Mk-42 targets located at ORNL, performing analytical studies, and providing technical support for life-cycle management of nuclear materials, such as americium, californium and curium. Nonproliferation Verification Research and Development Oak Ridge supports the Nonproliferation and Verification R&D program with: research to address the threat from nuclear weapons and radiological dispersal devices; providing leading-edge research into candidate materials, which could replace existing nuclear detectors used for gamma spectroscopy and neutron detection; nuclear material analysis efforts; research efforts to better understand and detect uranium enrichment operations and to understand associated effluents associated with those processes. Nonproliferation and International Security (NIS) In FY 2012, the NIS program at ORNL will continue to support safeguards technology and concept development; license and export request review activities, and export control cooperation with international partners. The ORNL supports the development of nuclear transparency measures. The facility also provides expertise on various arms control and nonproliferation agreements and treaties. The ORNL supports USG efforts to prepare for denuclearization and verification efforts in North Korea and other proliferating countries. Also, ORNL provides technical support to the NGSI related to safeguards and verification measures and uranium enrichment processing facilities. In addition, ORNL supports licensing and interdiction operations through reviews of export controlled items, and analytical tools and technical references for use in developing recommendations on U.S. export license Oak Ridge National Laboratory Page 551 FY 2012 Congressional Budget
Page 1:
Department of Energy FY 2012 Congre
Page 6 and 7:
Page 2
Page 8 and 9:
Page 4
Page 10 and 11:
Outyear Appropriation Summary NNSA
Page 12 and 13:
FY 2011 President’s Request level
Page 14 and 15:
NNSA Summary by Appropriation FY 20
Page 16 and 17:
Indirect Costs and Other Items of I
Page 18 and 19:
Other Indirect Cost Projections Fac
Page 20 and 21:
minimizing the impact to mission. C
Page 22 and 23:
Page 18
Page 24 and 25:
Page 20
Page 26 and 27:
Much of the nation’s nuclear expe
Page 28 and 29:
Office of the Administrator Office
Page 30 and 31:
Office of the Administrator/ Progra
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Congressionally Directed Projects F
Page 42 and 43:
Page 38
Page 44 and 45:
Page 40
Page 46 and 47:
Page 42
Page 48 and 49:
Page 44
Page 50 and 51:
Outyear Appropriation Summary by Pr
Page 52 and 53:
Mission The Weapons Activities appr
Page 54 and 55:
to identifying and responding to po
Page 56 and 57:
including securing dangerous nuclea
Page 58 and 59:
granularity of the costs required t
Page 60 and 61:
Department of Energy (DOE) Working
Page 62 and 63:
Outyear Funding Profile by Subprogr
Page 64 and 65:
Benefits The DSW’s four subprogra
Page 66 and 67:
Weapons Dismantlement and Dispositi
Page 68 and 69:
FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 FY 2012 Appr
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
FY 2010 Actual FY 2011 Approp Reque
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Stockpile Systems B61 Stockpile Sy
Page 82 and 83:
Stockpile Services Production Supp
Page 84 and 85:
Major Item of Equipment Major Items
Page 86 and 87:
conditions and in extreme environme
Page 88 and 89:
FY 2010 Accomplishments Advanced Ce
Page 90 and 91:
The Science Campaign is planning fu
Page 92 and 93:
(dollars in thousands) FY 2010 Actu
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Capital Operating Expenses and Cons
Page 98 and 99:
unauthorized use) are achieved and
Page 100 and 101:
• Successfully completed and test
Page 102 and 103:
Detailed Justification (dollars in
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Explanation of Funding Changes FY 2
Page 108 and 109:
Page 104
Page 110 and 111:
Campaign and a major goal for Natio
Page 112 and 113:
early FY 2012. Experiments that var
Page 114 and 115:
with 1 MJ of laser energy imploding
Page 116 and 117:
• Met the requirement for January
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
FY 2010 Actual Approp (dollars in t
Page 122 and 123:
Ignition Explanation of Funding Cha
Page 124 and 125:
Page 120
Page 126 and 127:
Benefits The ASC Campaign is compri
Page 128 and 129:
LANL and SNL. Cielo will be more th
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 132
Page 138 and 139:
The Readiness Campaign capabilities
Page 140 and 141:
• Rapid Design Commercial, off-th
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Stockpile Readiness Explanation of
Page 146 and 147:
Page 142
Page 148 and 149:
• Operate and maintain the nuclea
Page 150 and 151:
• Repaired, in collaboration with
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Operations of Facilities Kansas Ci
Page 164 and 165:
Material Recycle and Recovery FY 20
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
07-D-220, Radioactive Liquid Waste
Page 170 and 171:
Page 166
Page 172 and 173:
Phase A: Infrastructure and Site Im
Page 174 and 175:
(dollars in thousands) App ropriati
Page 176 and 177:
Current Total Estimate (dollars in
Page 178 and 179:
Page 174
Page 180 and 181:
2. Design, Construction, and D&D Sc
Page 182 and 183:
The project is being conducted in a
Page 184 and 185:
5. Financial Schedule (dollars in t
Page 186 and 187:
Total Estimated Cost (TEC) 6. Detai
Page 188 and 189:
Page 184
Page 190 and 191:
Project Description 4. Project Desc
Page 192 and 193:
Total Estimated Cost (TEC) 5. Finan
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 192
Page 198 and 199:
3. Baseline and Validation Status T
Page 200 and 201:
Tunnel, and d) perform minor target
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
9. Required D&D Information D&D Inf
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Other Project Cost (OPC) (dollars i
Page 210 and 211:
Current Total Estimate (dollars in
Page 212 and 213:
Page 208
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
will undergo a phased closure, cons
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 216
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
A Fire Water tie-in line to the HEU
Page 226 and 227:
6. Details of Project Cost Estimate
Page 228 and 229:
and available for demolition since
Page 230 and 231:
NNSA’s increased emphasis on proj
Page 232 and 233:
Nuclear Facility (dollars in thousa
Page 234 and 235:
RLUOB Facility 5. Financial Schedul
Page 236 and 237:
App ropriations (dollars in thousan
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
App ropriations (dollars in thousan
Page 242 and 243:
7. Schedule of Appropriation Reques
Page 244 and 245:
Area Gross Square Feet (gsf) TA-55-
Page 246 and 247:
transportation assets to meet shipp
Page 248 and 249:
Secure Transportation Asset Operati
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Mission Capacity Explanation of Fun
Page 254 and 255:
Secure Transportation Asset Program
Page 256 and 257:
Salaries and Benefits Explanation o
Page 258 and 259:
Investigation (FBI), and strengthen
Page 260 and 261:
• Outreach activities continued w
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Nuclear Counterterrorism (Homeland
Page 270 and 271:
Page 266
Page 272 and 273:
FIRP is complementary to the ongoin
Page 274 and 275:
Page 276 and 277:
Recapitalization Explanation of Fun
Page 278 and 279:
Page 274
Page 280 and 281:
Energy Modernization and Investment
Page 282 and 283:
Page 284 and 285:
Page 286 and 287:
Page 288 and 289:
Estimates of Security Costs Recover
Page 290 and 291:
Annual Performance Results and Targ
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296 and 297:
Explanation of Funding Changes Oper
Page 298 and 299:
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
7. Schedule of Appropriation Reques
Page 306 and 307:
Page 302
Page 308 and 309:
The entire NNSA workforce will reco
Page 310 and 311:
Page 312 and 313:
Cyber Security (Homeland Security)
Page 314 and 315:
Page 310
Page 316 and 317:
This enterprise would help assure p
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
Page 318
Page 324 and 325:
Page 320
Page 326 and 327:
Page 322
Page 328 and 329:
Page 324
Page 330 and 331:
FY 2010 Appropriation FY 2010 Budge
Page 332 and 333:
FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY
Page 334 and 335:
The Nuclear Detonation Detection (N
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
The Nuclear Safeguards and Security
Page 344 and 345:
• Engaged thousands of technical
Page 346 and 347:
Subprogram Subprogram Activity FY 2
Page 348 and 349:
Page 350 and 351:
Page 352 and 353:
Page 354 and 355:
Page 356 and 357:
Page 358 and 359:
Nuclear Safeguards and Security Exp
Page 360 and 361:
Page 356
Page 362 and 363:
In February 2005, the Bratislava In
Page 364 and 365:
Major Outyear Priorities and Assump
Page 366 and 367:
Page 368 and 369:
Page 370 and 371:
Page 372 and 373:
Navy Complex Explanation of Funding
Page 374 and 375:
Page 370
Page 376 and 377:
Crosscutting and Technical Support
Page 378 and 379:
Explanation of Funding Changes Zhel
Page 380 and 381:
Page 376
Page 382 and 383:
Preparation (PuP) project into a si
Page 384 and 385:
Detailed Justification FY 2010 Actu
Page 386 and 387:
Page 388 and 389:
Page 390 and 391:
Explanation of Funding Changes U.S.
Page 392 and 393:
Page 394 and 395:
Page 390
Page 396 and 397:
additional alternatives for disposi
Page 398 and 399:
operations and from other selected
Page 400 and 401:
Page 402 and 403:
6. Details of Project Cost Estimate
Page 404 and 405:
9. Required D&D Information Area Sq
Page 406 and 407:
CD-0 a CD-1 2. Design, Construction
Page 408 and 409:
FY 2011 and FY 2012 Description of
Page 410 and 411:
Page 412 and 413:
FY 2008 FY 2009 Performance Baselin
Page 414 and 415:
Page 410
Page 416 and 417:
Review Team (IRT), comprised of sub
Page 418 and 419:
4. Project Description, Justificati
Page 420 and 421:
5. Financial Schedule (dollars in t
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
8. Related Operations and Maintenan
Page 426 and 427:
Outyear Funding Profile by Subprogr
Page 428 and 429:
vital to GTRI’s mission because i
Page 430 and 431:
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 436 and 437:
Page 432
Page 438 and 439:
Page 434
Page 440 and 441:
Page 436
Page 442 and 443:
FY 2010 Budget Execution PY Balance
Page 444 and 445:
affect the operational availability
Page 446 and 447:
Major Outyear Priorities and Assump
Page 448 and 449:
Detailed Justification FY 2010 Actu
Page 450 and 451:
Page 452 and 453:
Page 454 and 455:
Page 456 and 457:
Page 458 and 459:
Page 460 and 461:
Page 462 and 463:
Page 464 and 465:
Page 466 and 467:
Page 468 and 469:
Major Items of Equipment (MIE) (TEC
Page 470 and 471:
The project is being conducted in a
Page 472 and 473:
Other Project Cost (OPC) Current To
Page 474 and 475:
Page 470
Page 476 and 477:
security systems requires upgrading
Page 478 and 479:
Not applicable for PED. 10. Acquisi
Page 480 and 481:
4. Project Description, Justificati
Page 482 and 483:
Page 484 and 485:
9. Required D&D Information Area Sq
Page 486 and 487:
FY 2010 Actual Appropriation FY 201
Page 488 and 489:
ACTIVITIES: Naval Reactors The broa
Page 490 and 491:
OUT-YEAR FUNDING: (dollars in thous
Page 492 and 493:
Readiness in Technical Base and Fac
Page 494 and 495:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: KNOLLS ATOMIC P
Page 496 and 497:
FUNDING BY PROGRAM: LAWRENCE LIVERM
Page 498 and 499:
INTRODUCTION: Site Description The
Page 500 and 501:
Engineering Campaign The Engineerin
Page 502 and 503:
or nuclear materials in the U.S. or
Page 504 and 505: addition, LLNL assists technical an
Page 506 and 507: OUT-YEAR FUNDING: (dollars in thous
Page 508 and 509: • Advanced Certification: Advance
Page 510 and 511: Advanced Simulation and Computing (
Page 512 and 513: focus on improving the efficiency o
Page 514 and 515: FUNDING BY PROGRAM: NEVADA NATIONAL
Page 516 and 517: NNSA Office of Defense Programs and
Page 518 and 519: Site Stewardship In FY 2012, Site S
Page 522 and 523: the past three years, this strategy
Page 524 and 525: FUNDING BY PROGRAM: SANDIA NATIONAL
Page 526 and 527: Sandia also conducts operations at
Page 528 and 529: Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignitio
Page 530 and 531: Site Stewardship Long Term Stewards
Page 532 and 533: supports the removal and disposal o
Page 536 and 537: Facilities include facilities manag
Page 538 and 539: at several Russian Enterprises. The
Page 542 and 543: highly enriched uranium (HEU) and o
Page 544 and 545: security program, and an alignment
Page 546 and 547: INTRODUCTION: Site Description The
Page 548 and 549: FUNDING BY PROGRAM: BROOKHAVEN NATI
Page 550 and 551: FUNDING BY PROGRAM: Chicago Operati
Page 552 and 553: Congressional Items of Interest: Th
Page 556 and 557: applications, and tracks global mac
Page 558 and 559: FUNDING BY PROGRAM: PACIFIC NORTHWE
Page 560 and 561: development mission. The PNNL also
Page 562: Page 558
show all

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?