02.08.2013 Views

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

Department of Energy FY 2012 Congressional ... - The FIRE Place

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Operations and<br />

Maintenance<br />

S8G Prototype Refueling<br />

(dollars in thousands)<br />

<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>FY</strong> 2013 <strong>FY</strong> 2014 <strong>FY</strong> 2015 <strong>FY</strong> 2016<br />

99,500 123,100 138,000 168,000 222,500<br />

Spent Fuel Handling Infrastructure Recapitalization: <strong>The</strong> Spent Fuel Handling Project (SFHP) will<br />

replace the over 50-year old Expended Core Facility (ECF) as the location for naval spent nuclear fuel<br />

receipt, inspection, dissection, packaging, and secure dry storage. Naval Reactors’ resultant ability to<br />

continue work in Idaho is dependent upon a viable, efficient fuel-handling infrastructure. Although the<br />

ECF continues to be maintained and operated in a safe and environmentally responsible manner, it no<br />

longer efficiently supports the nuclear Fleet. Uninterrupted receipt <strong>of</strong> naval spent nuclear fuel is vital to<br />

the timely, constant throughput <strong>of</strong> ship refuelings and return <strong>of</strong> these warships to full operational status<br />

in the Fleet. If an interruption were to extend over long periods, the ability to sustain Fleet operations<br />

would be impacted. Completion <strong>of</strong> the SFHP by 2020 is urgently needed to support the Navy’s tight<br />

refueling and defueling schedule for nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. A delay to delivery <strong>of</strong> this new<br />

facility will be cost prohibitive as it will require the procurement <strong>of</strong> additional M-290 shipping<br />

containers and A1G closure heads.<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> funding continues the conceptual design for the facility, equipment, and related systems.<br />

This is necessary to validating and approving the preliminary baseline and to initiate detailed project<br />

engineering and design. <strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> funding also supports continued NEPA-related efforts and project<br />

oversight (e.g., engineering procurement and construction management). Detailed project engineering<br />

and design work will commence in <strong>FY</strong> 2013 and construction will commence in <strong>FY</strong> 2015.<br />

Spent Fuel Handling Infrastructure Recapitalization<br />

(dollars in thousands)<br />

<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>FY</strong> 2013 <strong>FY</strong> 2014 <strong>FY</strong> 2015 <strong>FY</strong> 2016<br />

Operations and Maintenance 53,800 8,800 9,500 14,800 15,000<br />

<strong>The</strong> table below shows a breakout <strong>of</strong> these three major work scopes by subprogram for <strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong>:<br />

OHIO-class<br />

Replacement<br />

Submarine<br />

S8G Prototype<br />

Spent Fuel<br />

Handling<br />

Recapitalization<br />

Plant Technology 55,800 0 0<br />

Reactor Technology & Analysis 65,500 81,500 0<br />

Materials Development &<br />

Verification<br />

0 8,700 0<br />

Evaluation & Servicing 0 9,300 53,800<br />

Total, Major Work Scopes 121,300 99,500 53,800<br />

Naval Reactors/<br />

Operations and Maintenance<br />

Page 443<br />

<strong>FY</strong> <strong>2012</strong> <strong>Congressional</strong> Budget

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!