23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Series of Lessons on the Inner Teachings of the Philosophies and Religions of India1164<br />

bodies of Prakriti, ever changing and moving, and evolving—provided the<br />

fundamental theories of the Sankhyas be accepted. Kapila taught inorganic<br />

and organic evolution over 2,500 years before the days of Darwin and<br />

Herbert Spencer, and several centuries before Heraclitus, the great Grecian<br />

evolutionist.<br />

Kapila’s conception of Prakriti was not that of gross Matter, as so many<br />

of the Western writers on the subject are wont to assume. Instead, his<br />

conception may be expressed by the word “Nature,” as used by Bruno and<br />

other thinkers—that is, as a subtle, ethereal substance, partaking rather of<br />

the nature of an Energy, rather than of Matter—a substance far more subtle<br />

and ethereal than the Universal Ether of modern Western science.<br />

Prakriti is the Cosmic Primordial Energy, or Substance from which the<br />

universe is evolved, and into which it again resolves itself, in endless cycles<br />

of change. Prakriti, he held, was not composed of ultimate atoms, as some<br />

other Hindu philosophers had claimed, but was atomless and continuous, the<br />

atoms being but centres of influence and activity caused by the embodiment<br />

of the Purushas, which gave activity to them, and which afterward formed<br />

the atoms into combinations. Mind was composed of Chitta, or Mind-Stuff,<br />

which arose from the action of Purusha upon Prakriti. Prakriti is described as<br />

active, according to energies of its own, along almost automatic lines, but it<br />

is insentient and mindless in itself, the sentient qualities being possible only<br />

when instigated and inspired by the Purushas.<br />

Some of the illustrations used bring out the above mentioned point clearly,<br />

as for instance the ancient one in which Purusha is pictured as a “lame man<br />

possessed of eyesight and the other senses,” and Prakriti as “a man in whom<br />

the senses of seeing and hearing, etc., had been omitted, but who possessed<br />

a good pair of legs.” According to the fable, a combination is made and the<br />

lame man (Purusha) mounts up on the shoulders of the blind man (Prakriti)<br />

and together they move along briskly and intelligently, whereas separately<br />

they could make no progress. In the Sankhya conception of Manas or Mind<br />

as being of a semi-material nature, the conceptions of modern science of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!