23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Second Lesson: The Mystery of the Virgin Birth.949<br />

the story been written by and believed in by the writers, such action on<br />

their part being contrary to human custom and probability.<br />

3. The Gospels of Mark and John are absolutely silent on the subject; the<br />

oldest of the Gospels—that of Mark—bears no trace of the legend; and the<br />

latest Gospel—that of John—being equally free from its mention.<br />

4. The rest of the New Testament breathes not a word of the story or<br />

doctrine. The Book of Acts, generally accepted as having also been written by<br />

Luke, ignores the subject completely. Paul, the teacher of Luke, and the great<br />

writer of the Early Church, seems to know nothing whatever about the Virgin<br />

Birth, or else purposely ignores it entirely, the latter being unbelievable<br />

in such a man. Peter, the First Apostle, makes no mention of the story or<br />

doctrine in his great Epistles, which fact is inconceivable if he knew of and<br />

believed in the legend. The Book of Revelation is likewise silent upon this<br />

doctrine which played so important a part in the later history of the Church.<br />

The great writings of the New Testament contain no mention of the story,<br />

outside of the brief mention in Matthew and Luke, alluded to above.<br />

5. There are many verses in the Gospels and Epistles which go to prove,<br />

either that the story was unknown to the writers, or else not accepted by<br />

them. The genealogies of Joseph are cited to prove the descent of Jesus from<br />

David, which depends entirely upon the fact of Joseph’s actual parentage. Jesus<br />

is repeatedly and freely mentioned as the son of Joseph. Paul and the other<br />

Apostles hold firmly to the doctrine of the necessity of the Death of Jesus;<br />

his Rising from the Dead; and his Ascension into Heaven, etc. But they had<br />

nothing to say regarding any necessity for his Virgin Birth, or the necessity<br />

for the acceptance of any such doctrine—they are absolutely silent on this<br />

point, although they were careful men, omitting no important detail of<br />

doctrine. Paul even speaks of Jesus as “of the seed of David.” (Romans 1:3)<br />

6. The Virgin Birth was not a part of the early traditions or doctrine of the<br />

Church, but was unknown to it. And it is not referred to in the preaching and<br />

teaching of the Apostles, as may have been seen by reference to the Book<br />

of Acts. This book, which relates the Acts and Teachings of the Apostles,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!