23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Series of Lessons on the Inner Teachings of the Philosophies and Religions of India1250<br />

was that of “The Thing-in-Itself” with all of its manifestations vanished—the<br />

Absolute as Non-Being, as distinguished from The Absolute as Being, But<br />

as all advanced Western students of philosophy know full well, “Non-Being”<br />

does not mean “Nothing,” but is the term used to designate Reality in Pure<br />

Essence, as distinguished from Reality manifesting Relativity.<br />

And so we state positively that a careful study of the original teachings of<br />

Gautama will reveal the fact that he did not teach the doctrine of Ultimate<br />

Nothingness or Nihilism; but that his “No-Thing” was identical with the<br />

Western conception of Non-Being, which is really the highest conception of<br />

Reality “beyond-Being”; and that he recognized that in its purest essence as<br />

the fundamental reality underlying all that is in appearance. Without this basic<br />

conception, the entire philosophy of Gautama would fall to the ground—<br />

would be meaningless—would be a doctrine of Something proceeding<br />

from Nothing and to Nothing returning in order to gain Freedom—a<br />

palpable absurdity lacking all sanity, and opposed to every principle ad<br />

instinct of Hindu thought. Gautama indeed taught the Nothingness of the<br />

phenomenal life, or Samsara, even surpassing the Advaitist Vedantists in<br />

his conception of the nature of Maya, which he denounced as the purest<br />

Ignorance lacking even a shadow of Truth or Reality; a Lie in the mind of<br />

The Absolute. But upon that he founded his teachings—upon that which<br />

is ever present in all Hindu thought—that which if removed would bring<br />

all Hindu thought tumbling in shattered bits beyond possibility of repair<br />

or restoration. Gautama was considered as an iconoclast—an infidel—an<br />

“atheist” even, in the eyes of the orthodox church of India—but he was not<br />

a Fool, claiming a nothing as a basis for All-Things. Surely the “interpreters”<br />

of Buddha have inverted his pyramid of thought.<br />

While Gautama forbade all speculation regarding the nature of the<br />

Unknowable, holding that the ultimate questions could not be grasped<br />

by the human mind, although “all would be understood” when the state<br />

of Nirvana was reached, still from the sidelights which he threw upon<br />

his doctrines from time to time, it may be stated that his Inner Teachings

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!