23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Seventh Lesson: Buddhism.1249<br />

philosophical thought knows that the one positive position from which the<br />

Hindu mind refuses to budge, is the idea that “Something never can come<br />

from nothing—nor can something be resolved into nothing”; or, as it is often<br />

expressed, “From nothing, nothing comes.” And, moreover, to suppose that<br />

the Nirvana, or Soul Freedom, of Gautama was a state of “nothingness” or<br />

annihilation, shows a profound ignorance of the fundamental conceptions<br />

of the Buddhist philosophy, as well as of the general Hindu, or even the<br />

general Oriental, thought, through all of which the thread of an Ultimate<br />

Universal Consciousness runs unbroken. And yet you will find the majority<br />

of Western writers on Buddhism assuring you that Nirvana, the goal of the<br />

Buddhist, is a “state of nothingness,” or “a state of annihilation.” Nirvana<br />

is “the annihilation of Maya”—a “blowing out of Avidya, or Ignorance”—<br />

and a state of Universal Inner Consciousness, rather than an extinction of<br />

consciousness. And if these Western writers fail to grasp even this important<br />

point of the Buddhist teachings, how can you expect them to grasp the<br />

subtle minor points of doctrine?<br />

As we have said, Gautama refused to speculate upon The Absolute, that,<br />

Brahman, or the Noumenal. But instead of denying its existence, he merely<br />

treated it as an existent Unknowable, a position very similar to that of<br />

Herbert Spencer, the great English philosopher, whom men mistakenly call<br />

a materialist,” although he clearly and positively postulates an “Unknowable”<br />

upon which the entire phenomenal universe or “The Knowable” depends<br />

and is sustained. Gautama admits this Unknowable, and although he treats<br />

it as a No-Thing, he does not claim it is Nothing—it is simply that which is<br />

entirely “Different from and Antecedent to Things.” So subtle is Gautama’s<br />

conception and analysis that it is no wonder that his meaning escapes the<br />

observation of the Western examiners of his teachings. For not only does he<br />

consider the Absolute-in-Action, or that Manifesting, as the Unknowable;<br />

but he also perceives to exist a Para-Brahm—that is that in its aspect of<br />

Rest and Not-Activity—Brahman divested even of Maya and the Illusory<br />

Universe. To use Western terms Gautama’s highest and ultimate conception

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!