23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Advanced Course in Yogi Philosophy and Oriental Occultism384<br />

the prophet, the priest placing the authorship upon God rather than upon<br />

himself, knowing that the people would be more apt to respect and obey<br />

a Divine command than one emanating from a mere man. The advocates of<br />

the intuitional theory hold that the so-called “revelations” really arose from<br />

the conscience and intuition of the prophet, who being a more advanced<br />

man than his people would be apt to sense more clearly the voice of the<br />

spirit, but who would attribute the voice of conscience to God, and who,<br />

accordingly would so give out the message. The intuition of the people<br />

would enable them to see the “rightness” of the so-called Divine message,<br />

and they would accept same with the approval of their consciences. Another<br />

objection raised against the Theory of Revelation is that there are many socalled<br />

revelations, differing materially in detail—each religion having its own<br />

set of revelations, through its own prophets and teachers. It is held that if<br />

God wished to reveal a code of morals to His people, his revelations would<br />

agree, and would be given in such a way that there could be no mistaking<br />

them. It is also held that it is impossible to regard any one of these numerous<br />

revelations as authoritative, owing to the impossibility of selecting any<br />

one from the great number, as each prophet made equally strong claims<br />

that he received the revelation direct from God, and there is no Supreme<br />

Court to pass finally upon the matter. It is also objected to that many of<br />

the things claimed to have been directed by God have no real connection<br />

with morality, but deal with the details of the life of the people, such as<br />

the mode of slaughtering animals; the selection of kinds of food; various<br />

religious ceremonials, etc., which are as strictly enjoined as are the rules of<br />

conduct, and are equally entitled to be regarded as examples of “right and<br />

wrong.” Then, again, there are many things sanctioned in these so-called<br />

revelations that are contrary to our modern conceptions of morality. Divine<br />

commands were given to kill enemies in a most barbarous fashion, which the<br />

law of nations now prohibits, and only savage nations now follow. In such a<br />

case it would seem that the intuition or reason of man has raised a higher<br />

ideal than did God. The same is true of polygamy and slavery, which are not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!