23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Series of Lessons in Mystic Christianity948<br />

made no mention of the Virgin Birth, and taught nothing of the kind, Luke<br />

must have acquired the legend later, if, indeed, the narrative was written by<br />

him at all in his Gospel.<br />

It is likewise noted that Luke also gives a genealogy of Jesus, from Adam,<br />

through Abraham, and David, and Joseph. The words in parenthesis “as was<br />

supposed,” in Luke 3:23, are supposed to have been inserted in the text by a<br />

later writer, as there would be no sense or reason in tracing the genealogy of<br />

Jesus through a “supposed” father. The verse in question reads thusly: “And<br />

Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed)<br />

the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,” etc. Students, of course, notice<br />

that the line of descent given by Luke differs very materially from that given<br />

by Matthew, showing a lack of knowledge on the part of one or the other<br />

writer.<br />

On the whole, scholars consider it most remarkable that this account of<br />

the Virgin Birth should be given by Luke, who was a most ardent Pauline<br />

student and follower, in view of the fact that Paul ignored the whole<br />

legend, if, indeed, he had ever heard of it. Surely a man like Paul would<br />

have laid great stress upon this wonderful event had he believed in it, or<br />

had it formed a part of the Christian Doctrine of his time. That Luke should<br />

have written this account is a great mystery—and many feel that it is much<br />

easier to accept the theory of the later interpolation of the story into Luke’s<br />

Gospel, particularly in view of the corroborative indications.<br />

Summing up the views of the Higher Criticism, we may say that the general<br />

position taken by the opponents and deniers of the Virgin Birth of Jesus is<br />

about as follows:<br />

1. The story of the Virgin Birth is found only in the introductory portion of<br />

two of the four Gospels—Matthew and Luke—and even in these the story<br />

bears the appearance of having been “fitted in” by later writers.<br />

2. Even Matthew and Luke are silent about the matter after the statements<br />

in the introductory part of their Gospels, which could scarcely occur had

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!