23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A Series of Lessons on the Inner Teachings of the Philosophies and Religions of India1248<br />

Let us first examine the fundamental conceptions of the Buddhist system<br />

of philosophy. In the first place a reference to many of the English books<br />

upon Buddhism will give the student the impression that Gautama, taught<br />

an atheistic philosophy, which closely approached materialism, denying<br />

any Reality back of phenomenal life, and refusing to admit the existence of<br />

Brahman; and that also he denied the existence of the “soul,” although he<br />

explained Reincarnation under the “desperate expedient” of Karma, which<br />

afforded a connecting link between the lives of the successive beings in the<br />

Chain of Rebirth or Samsara. On both of these points Western discussion<br />

has raged fiercely, some holding to the above ideas, while others attempted<br />

to combat them. We think that when the Fundamental Principles of the Inner<br />

Teachings of the Hindu Philosophies are applied to the teachings of Buddha<br />

order may be brought out of chaos. Such is the opinion of the advanced<br />

Hindu teachers (non-Buddhists, remember) who would protect Gautama<br />

from the attacks of his orthodox Hindu opponents, and the Western writers<br />

on Buddhism. Let us examine into the matter.<br />

In the first place Gautama did not deny the existence of Brahman, but<br />

simply refused to speculate regarding Its nature, character and being,<br />

holding that the concern of man was with the phenomenal world and the<br />

escape therefrom—and that speculation upon Brahman was useless and a<br />

waste of time—“Enough to know that that is” was his idea. He denied the<br />

existence of Ishwara, the Personal God, of the Hindus, and thus brought<br />

upon himself the reproach of Atheism, which had also been visited upon<br />

the heads of Kapila and other philosophical teachers. But Gautama did not<br />

deny the existence of that—he merely took it for granted without argument<br />

as a fundamental axiomic truth. Nay, more, in his system he clearly indicated<br />

the existence of a Para-Brahm, or Supreme Brahman, that is a Brahman in<br />

the aspect of Non-Being, or Non-Manifestation.<br />

Gautama has been described as postulating a “Nothing” from which<br />

the phenomenal universe emerged, and into which it would return. Now,<br />

anyone at all familiar with the fundamental conceptions of the Hindu

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!