23.06.2015 Views

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

7rcTIX1xP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Advanced Course in Yogi Philosophy and Oriental Occultism386<br />

of today tells us is “wrong.” People have been burned at the stake—have<br />

had holes bored in their tongues—have been tortured physically and<br />

mentally at the dictates of the consciences of the persecutors, who were<br />

just as sincere as those whom they persecuted.<br />

If the principle of “conscience” were implicitly followed, the “conscience”<br />

of the majority might make things very unpleasant for the minority, as it has<br />

happened many times in the past. So, you see, the theory that “conscience”<br />

as an infallible guide may be attacked severely by its opponents. And yet,<br />

the Yogi Philosophy of Dharma, while recognizing these objections, also<br />

sees much truth in the theory of intuition or “conscience,” and welds it into<br />

place in its system, as we shall see later on in this lesson.<br />

(3) The Theory of Utility. This theory often is attacked severely on the<br />

ground that it is a purely selfish idea—that the basis of morality offered<br />

is “happiness”—the happiness of the individual modified by the happiness<br />

of those around him—“the greatest happiness to the greatest number,” in<br />

short—and that such a basis fails to recognize the higher destiny of man,<br />

being based entirely upon his earthly and material existence. To this the<br />

utilitarian very naturally answers that any code of conduct has a more or<br />

less selfish basis, inasmuch as a man doing certain things, and refraining<br />

from doing certain other things, by reason of hope of Divine approval and<br />

reward, or fear of Divine displeasure and punishment, is as selfish as one<br />

who is actuated by the idea of material happiness or unhappiness. Another<br />

objection urged is that acting under it the average man would be impelled<br />

to get as much happiness for himself as possible, and to bestow as little<br />

happiness upon others as he could help, as there would be no reason<br />

why he should act otherwise—in fact, that he would obey the letter of the<br />

human law, and not go one inch further. Theoretically this objection might<br />

be correct, but, in spite of cold theory, man is open to higher impulses and<br />

motives coming from regions of his soul that the utilitarian philosophy, as<br />

well as its opponents, fail to recognize. A form of this same objection is found<br />

in the idea that the utilitarian philosophy appeals only to the developed

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!