5cjxburmr

Similarly, if the Occupying Power considers it necessary, for imperative reasons ofsecurity, to take safety measures concerning protected persons, it may, at the most, subject themto assigned residence or to internment. 10210.6.4 Support to Persons Who Are Assigned Residence Should Be Guided byInternment Standards. In applying the provisions of the second paragraph of Article 39 of theGC to the cases of persons required to leave their usual places of residence by virtue of adecision placing them in assigned residence elsewhere, the Detaining Power shall be guided asclosely as possible by the standards of welfare set forth in Part III, Section IV of the GC. 103 Inother words, if the State assigns residence to a protected person in its home territory that resultsin the protected person being unable to support himself or herself and his or her dependents, theState shall provide support to that protected person and his or her dependents, being guided asclosely as possible by the standards of welfare set forth in Part III, Section IV of the GC, whichprovides regulations for the treatment of internees.Similarly, in occupied territory, protected persons made subject to assigned residence andthus required to leave their homes shall enjoy the full benefit of Article 39 of the GC. 104 Forexample, the internment standards in the GC should also be a guide for support to protectedpersons and their dependents who are subject to assigned residence in occupied territory.10.6.5 Refugees Who Do Not Enjoy the Protection of Any Government. In applying themeasures of control mentioned in the GC to protected persons in its home territory, the DetainingPower shall not treat as enemy aliens exclusively on the basis of their nationality de jure of anenemy State, refugees who do not, in fact, enjoy the protection of any government. 105 Forexample, a refugee who is not actually protected by his or her government should not beautomatically subject to control measures simply on the basis of enemy nationality, but may besubject to any other recognized control measure if there are additional reasons for such action. 106more severe than that of assigned residence or internment, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 42 and43.”).102 GC art. 78 (“If the Occupying Power considers it necessary, for imperative reasons of security, to take safetymeasures concerning protected persons, it may, at the most, subject them to assigned residence or to internment.”).103 GC art. 41 (“In applying the provisions of Article 39, second paragraph, to the cases of persons required to leavetheir usual places of residence by virtue of a decision placing them in assigned residence elsewhere, the DetainingPower shall be guided as closely as possible by the standards of welfare set forth in Part III, Section IV of thisConvention.”).104 GC art. 78 (“Protected persons made subject to assigned residence and thus required to leave their homes shallenjoy the full benefit of Article 39 of the present Convention.”).105 GC art. 44 (“In applying the measures of control mentioned in the present Convention, the Detaining Power shallnot treat as enemy aliens exclusively on the basis of their nationality de jure of an enemy State, refugees who do not,in fact, enjoy the protection of any government.”).106 See 1956 FM 27-10 (Change No. 1 1976) 283b (“The purpose of the foregoing article [37 of the GC] is to insurethat refugees who may only technically remain enemy aliens are not on that basis automatically subject to controlmeasures, notwithstanding the fact they actually are not protected by their government. However, the quotedprovision does not in any way deny the right of a State to intern any such person or subject him to any otherrecognized measure of control when there is any additional reason that renders necessary the taking of such action asmay be required for the security of the State in a moment of national crisis.”).661