Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

viii4.1.2. The Portuguese judgments ......................................................................... 1584.1.2.1. Function ................................................................................................. 1594.1.2.2. Institutional context ................................................................................ 1594.1.2.3. Experts.................................................................................................... 1604.1.2.4. Macrostructure ....................................................................................... 1604.1.2.5. Content ................................................................................................... 1664.1.3. The Canadian judgments ............................................................................ 1674.1.3.1. Function ................................................................................................. 1684.1.3.2. Institutional context ................................................................................ 1684.1.3.3. Experts.................................................................................................... 1694.1.3.4. Macrostructure ....................................................................................... 1694.1.3.5. Content ................................................................................................... 1734.1.4. Comparability and representativeness........................................................ 1734.1.4.1. Function ................................................................................................. 1754.1.4.2. Institutional context ................................................................................ 1754.1.4.3. Experts.................................................................................................... 1754.1.4.4. Macrostructure ....................................................................................... 1774.1.4.5. Content ................................................................................................... 1784.2. Bottom-up workflow .......................................................................................... 1784.3.1. Extraction of candidate terms..................................................................... 1794.3.2. Validation of candidate terms .................................................................... 1804.3.3. Sense distinctions ....................................................................................... 1854.3.4. Selection of contexts .................................................................................. 1904.3.5. Actantial structures..................................................................................... 1934.3.6. Frame description ....................................................................................... 1984.3.7. Data encoding............................................................................................. 2014.3.8. Annotation of contexts ............................................................................... 2044.3.9. Data validation ........................................................................................... 215