11.07.2015 Views

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

307As the research specifically aimed at assigning the equivalents of specialized verbs,the various theoretical frameworks that have been applied to the treatment of this kind ofpredicative units were reviewed as well as the few contributions on the i<strong>de</strong>ntification ofspecialized verb equivalents. The findings of the research confirm the principles set out inthe works of Chodkiewicz and Gross (2005), Lerat (2002), L‘Homme (2008) and Pimenteland L‘Homme (2011): the argument structures of the verbs as well as a classification of theactants in terms of the entities that can instantiate them are of paramount importance to thei<strong>de</strong>ntification of the equivalents. Therefore, in this respect, the findings of the research arenot original. In fact, the originality of the current contribution lies in the systematicity ofthe methodology as well as in the possibility it provi<strong>de</strong>s for i<strong>de</strong>ntifying several candidateequivalents and for differentiating between full and partial equivalents. This leads us todraw consi<strong>de</strong>rations on the kind of theoretical frameworks that can be used to <strong>de</strong>scribespecialized verbs and assign their equivalents.It was observed that the arguments of predicates in legal discourse usually refer toabstract legal entities which can be sub-categorized by means of fine-grainedgeneralizations. The theories that were discussed that are the best equipped to examinespecialized verbs in these molds are the theory of the classes of objects and FrameSemantics, even though the theories were originally conceived to <strong>de</strong>scribe generallanguage. As mentioned, the main difference between the theory of the classes of objectsand the theory of Frame Semantics as well as FrameNet‘s methodology resi<strong>de</strong>s in the factthat the latter directly explains the scenarios in which a given class of predicates participatewhereas the <strong>forme</strong>r does not. In addition, the notion of semantic frame as a scenario that isto a fair <strong>de</strong>gree language in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt (Boas 2005; Baker 2009) served, in this research, notonly to <strong>de</strong>scribe the extralinguistic properties of specialized verbs but also to assign theirequivalents.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!