Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

103mesma quantia global, de 6151000 escudos [objectivo]. (Fonte: Acórdão02B2159)Translation:A new sentence was pronounced (fls. 241 a 252). And similarly to the previousone, the defendant [Patient] was sentenced to pay to the authors the same globalamount of 6151000 escudos. [Goal]. (Source: Acórdão 02B2159)Finally, based on the FrameNet project, their analysis involves using frames toclassify the entities related to the extralinguistic context. They explain that whereassemantic roles allow them to represent the participants in the predications, the frameelements allow them to represent the participants in the situation evoked by the LU inquestion. The same example illustrates the identification of the frame elements (Alves etal 2005: 130):Foi proferida nova sentença [meio] (fls. 241 a 252). E, no essencial, com omesmo conteúdo da anterior, sendo a Ré [avaliado] condenada a pagar aosautores, a mesma quantia global, de 6151000 escudos [tópico]. (Fonte: Acórdão02B2159)Translation:A new sentence was pronounced [Means] (fls. 241 a 252). And similarly to theprevious one, the defendant [Evaluated] was sentenced to pay to the authors thesame global amount of 6151000 escudos. [Topic]. (Source: Acórdão 02B2159)The methodology designed by this group of researchers allows them to representthe condenar as a judgment_communication verb (Table 6), in which a ―communicator‖(implicit in the context above) communicates a judgment on ―somebody who wasevaluated‖ (―a autora‖) to a given subject (uninstantiated in the context above). Theynote that the information in Table 6 took the corpus as the point of departure but did notlimit itself to it, as the relations among the selected verbs were linked to other verbs thatdid not occur in the corpus. Once the corpus analysis is completed, they then proceed toencode the information gathered in the ontology editor Protégé in OWL format.