Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

192acquit 1He excluded the evidence and acquitted the accused.The judge acquitted him of murder but convicted him of manslaughter.After hearing his alibi evidence, the trial judge acquitted him on both counts.Morphological and semantic derivatives. Contexts were selected when theycontained morphological and semantic derivatives of target terms. Termderivatives are interesting because they may hold a lexical relation with targetterms. As mentioned, even though the research only focuses on specializedverbs for the time being, it may develop and include the description of otherparts of speech terms in the future. Term derivatives that evoke the same frameas target terms can be grouped together into the same frame.infringe 1Although s. 329 of the Canada Elections Act infringes freedom of expression, thisinfringement is justified under s. 1 of the Charter.Synonyms and near-synonyms. Contexts were selected when synonyms, nearsynonymsor synonymic expressions of the target terms were present, becausethey may help understand the meaning of the terms and because they can besame-frame-evoking terms.appeal 1The determination of the judge is final and may not be appealed or judiciallyreviewed.infringe 1As stated earlier, A.C.'s argument that ss. 25(8) and 25(9) infringe the Charter isgrounded in the contention that they fail to respect the mature minors' "deeplyrooted" right to decide their own medical care.Antonyms. Contexts were selected when antonyms were present, because someantonyms may be same-frame-evoking terms.