Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

205After hearing his alibi evidence, the trial judge acquitted him on both counts,stating as follows (at p. 813): It is quite apparent that perjury has been committedin this Court room.If the term appeared in a subordinate clause, only the FEs appearing in thatsubordinate clause were annotated:For example, in Cr. A. 112/50, Yosifof v. Attorney-General, 5 P.D. 481, the courtheld that a legal prohibition on the practice of bigamy did not infringe the freedomof religion of a Jewish man who was a member of a particular community, becausethat practice was not mandatory according to the Jewish religion.Core and non-core FEsThe second part of the annotation model accounts for the behaviour of the terms in context,namely by describing the mandatory as well as the optional participants in their meaning.The annotation of the FEs appears between the tags and . These tags containtwo mandatory attributes: type and role. The value of the attribute type can be ―core‖ or―non-core‖. The value of the attribute role can vary considerably as it corresponds to thesemantic labels described in Appendix 8.The accused was acquitted at trial and the verdict was overturned on appeal.The accusedwas acquittedat trialand the verdict was overturned on appeal.Figure 28. Annotation of core and non-core FEsIn the context provided in Figure 28 two FEs were annotated: the accused and attrial. The first one is annotated as core because it is a mandatory participant in the frame