Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

282incorrer 1Não obstante saber que as aprovações ou indeferimentos eram anuais e só porperíodo anual podiam ser consideradas, a A. decidiu incorrer em desobediênciafrontal, pondo em causa a autoridade e poder da direcção e gestão da sua entidadepatronal.Translations:* Although the approvals and rejections were considered on a yearly basis, the A.decided to commit direct disobedience by contesting the authority and power of thedirection and management of the employer.Although the approvals and rejections were considered on a yearly basis, the A.decided to engage in direct disobedience by contesting the authority and power ofthe direction and management of the employer.praticar 1Na réplica a A. sustenta a improcedência da reconvenção, porquanto a A. nãopraticou qualquer facto ilícito.Translations:In response, the A. argues that the cross-complaint should not proceed because theA. did not commit any illegal fact.The following pairs of terms are partial equivalents for similar reasons: argue 1 andaduzir 1 , apply 3 and deduzir 1 , assert 1 and aduzir 1 , assert 1 and exercer 1 , commit 1 andincorrer 1 , commit 1 and praticar 1 , consider 2 and julgar 1 , contend 1 and aduzir 1 , deem 1 andjulgar 1 , invoke 1 and declarar 1 , invoke 1 and propugnar 1 , request 1 and formular 1 , seek 1 andformular 1 , state 1 and aduzir 1 , submit 1 and aduzir 1 .5.3.1.2.3. Semantic prosodyAbout 3% of the total number of equivalent pairs (i.e. 5 out of the 165 pairs of equivalents)and 10% of the total number of partial equivalents were given the partial equivalence statusbecause the comparison of the descriptions revealed that the semantic prosody of one of theactants is different.