Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

200structure of violate 2 and infringe 2 is composed of two actants: a PROTAGONIST or an ACTand the LAW.Table 19. comply 2 , exceed 1 , infringe 1 , and violate 1 evoke the [Compliance] framePROTAGONIST ACT LAWbidder, body, city, counterpart,CRA, firm, issuer, judge,offender, officer, official, Mr.Khosa, person, respondent,SAAQ, SLC, Telusconduct, detention,transactioncomply 2condition, fairness, law,letter, oath of office,obligation, order, provision,regulation, requirement,rule, section, sentence, termMr. Khosa (PROTAGONIST) had complied with all provisions of his conditional sentence (LAW).adjudicator, agency, body, Courtof Appeal, he, judge, Longueuil,Smith J.A., VPAaction, blood alcoholconcentration, delay,interference, purposeexceed 1The Court of Appeal (PROTAGONIST) exceeded the limits of appellate review (LAW).child, owner, police, SPCUM,stateaction, copy, detention,order, roadblock,unavailability, useinfringe 2authority, bound, function,guideline, jurisdiction,limit, mandate, power,scope, thresholdcopyright, freedom, law,liberty, patent, provision,right, rule, section, securityThe HRT found that by rejecting it, the SPCUM (PROTAGONIST) had infringed s. 18.2 of the Charter (LAW).agency, authority, BNS, city,counsel, Crown, government,IRPAaction, change, detention,search, suppression,transfusion, useviolate 2The searches of the accused (ACT) did not violate s. 8 of the Charter (LAW).agreement, charter, duty,law, principle, provision,obligation, order, right,section, undertakingAs mentioned in section 4.3.5, the label ACT refers to an action or behaviour,whereas the label PROTAGONIST refers to a volitional or, in FrameNet‘s terminology,―sentient‖ agent. However, the actants that receive these labels are not simultaneously used:it is either an ACT or a PROTAGONIST that violate or infringe the law. Thus, although thelinguistic realizations of the actant LAW of the terms violate 2 and infringe 2 are comparableto the linguistic realizations of the actant LAW2 of the terms violate 1 and infringe 1 , thelinguistic realizations of the actant PROTAGONIST and ACT are not comparable to LAW1because they denote radically different entities. In addition, terms like comply 2 , excceed 1