Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

206evoked by the target term acquit 1 , whereas the second one is annotated as non-core becauseit only situates the event in place. These two labels are described in Appendix 8 in whichmore illustrative examples of their use can be found.In some contexts, a non-core FE may be embedded in a core FE. For instance, in thecontext of conclude 1 below the non-core FE BASIS (double underline) is embedded in thecore FE DECISION which takes the form of a that-clause. Similarly, in the context ofconcluir 1 , the non-core FE CASE (double underline) is embedded in the core FE DECISION.In this kind of situations, only the core FE DECISION is annotated.conclude 1The trial judge correctly concluded that on the basis of the jury's verdict, he mustfind facts consistent with the jury's rejection of both self-defence and intent formurder (DECISION).concluir 1O questionado aresto concluiu que, in casu, a transferência do autor para a IlhaGraciosa acarretava-lhe prejuízos sérios (DECISION) .Translation:The decision that is being contested concluded that, in that case, the transfer of theplaintiff to the Graciosa Island caused him serious damages (DECISION) .In some other contexts, a core FE is embedded in another core FE. For instance,declarar 1 evokes a frame which contains three core FEs: COURT, ISSUE and EFFECT. In themajority of cases, all three core FEs are instantiated in each context of the verb. However,in the context below, the core FE ISSUE, do art. 2.° do CC, is a modifier of the core FEEFFECT a inconstitucionalidade. In this kind of situations, only the FE that corresponds tothe head of the NP is annotated.