UniversitÃ© de MontrÃ©al - ThÃ¨se sous forme numÃ©rique

More documents

Recommendations

Info

318Gémar, J-C. (2007). ―Retour à la sagesse ? Sept piliers du savoir-faire du traducteurjuridique.‖ In E. Lavault-Olléon (ed.) Traduction spécialisée, pratique, theories,formations. Berne, Berlin, Bruxelles, NY, Oxford: Peter Lang.Gémar, J-C. (2008). ―Forme et sens du message juridique en traduction.‖ InternationalJournal for the Semiotics of Law 21: 323–335.Gémar, J-C. (2011). ―Aux sources de la ―jurilinguistique.‖ In P. Gréciano and J. Humbley(dir.) Langue et droit : terminologie et traduction. Vol. XVI, 2011-1 de la RevueFrançaise de Linguistique Appliquée.Gémar, J-C. (ed.) (1982). Langage du droit et traduction. Essaies de Jurilinguistique. / TheLanguage of the Law and Translation. Essays on Jurilinguistics. Montréal:Linguatech.Gémar, J-C. and N. Kasirer (2005). Jurilinguistique: entre langues et droits.Jurilinguistics: Between Law and Language. Montréal / Bruxelles: Thémis /Bruylant.Gläser, R. (1990). Fachtextsorten im Englishen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Gouws, R. H. (2000). ―Strategies in Equivalent Discrimination.‖ In J. Mogensen, V.Hjørnager Pedersen and A. Zettersten (eds.) Symposium on Lexicography IX. 99-111. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Gréciano, P. and J. Humbley (dir.) (2011). Langue et droit : terminologie et traduction.Vol. XVI, 2011-1 de la Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée.Groffier, E. and D. Reed (1990). La lexicographie juridique. Principes et méthodes.Cowansville: Éditions Yvon Blais.Gross, G. (1994). ―Classes d‘objets et description des verbs.‖ Langages 28 (115): 15-30.Gross, G. (1995). ―Une sémantique nouvelle pour la traduction automatique : les classesd'objets.‖ La Tribune des Industries de la Langue et de l'Information électronique,n° 17-18-19. 16-19. Paris: AUPELF-UREF.Gross, G. (1996). Les expressions figées en français : noms composés et autres locutions.Paris: Ophrys.Gross, G. (2003). ―On the description of classes of predicates.‖ Language Research, specialissue: 39-53.
319Gross, G. and F. Guenthner (2002). ―Comment décrire une langue de spécialité ?.‖ Cahiersde lexicologie 80: 179-199. Paris: Champion.Gross, G. and M. Mathieu-Colas (2001). ―Description de la langue de la medicine.‖ Meta46(1): 68-81.Gross, M. (1975). Méthodes en syntaxe. Paris: Hermann.Gross, M. (1981). ―Les bases empiriques de la notion de prédicat sémantique.‖ Langages63: 7-52. Paris: Larousse.Guenthner, S. and H. Knoblauch (1995). ―Culturally patterned speaking practices - theanalysis of communicative genres.‖ Pragmatics 5(1): 1-32.Guimarães, J. (2004). Elaboração de ementas jurisprudenciais: elementos teóricometodológicos.Brasília: Editora UnB.Hadouche, F. (2010). ―Annotation syntaxico-sémantique des actants en corpus spécialisé.‖Doctoral thesis, Université de Montréal.Hadouche, F., S. Desgroseilliers, J. Pimentel, M.C. L‘Homme and G. Lapalme (2011).―Identification des participants de lexies prédicatives : évaluation en performance eten temps d‘un système d‘annotation automatique.‖ Conférence Terminologie etIntelligence Artificielle (TIA 2011), Paris 2011, 7-9 novembre 2011.Hanks, P. (2000). ―Do Word Meanings Exist?.‖ Computers and the Humanities 34(1-2):171-177.Harris, Z.S. (1964). The Elementary Transformations. T.D.A.P. Report. Philadelphia:University of Pennsylvania.Harris, Z.S. (1968). ―Mathematical Structures of Language.‖ Interscience Tracts in Pureand Applied Mathematics 21. New York: Interscience Publishers John Wiley &Sons.Harris, Z.S. (1976). Notes du cours de syntaxe. Paris: Le Seuil.Hartmann, R. R. K. (2007 [1985]). ―Contrastive Text Analysis and the Search forEquivalence in the Bilingual Dictionary.‖ In K. Hyldgaard-Jensen and A. Zettersten(eds.) Symposium on Lexicography II. 121–132. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Reprinted in Hartmann (2007). Interlingual Lexicography Selected Essays onTranslation Equivalence, Contrastive Linguistics and the Bilingual Dictionary. 15–23. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Hartmann, R. R. K. and G. James (1998). Dictionary of Lexicography. London: Routledge.
Page 3 and 4:
Université de MontréalFaculté de
Page 5 and 6:
iiiframework to the compilation of
Page 7 and 8:
vd‘autres contributions ayant dé
Page 9 and 10:
vii2.3.1. The theory of classes of
Page 12 and 13:
x5.3.1. Full equivalents ..........
Page 14:
xiiTable 23. The frame [Proof] grou
Page 19 and 20:
xviiTypographical conventionsTerms:
Page 21 and 22:
xixTo my parents, Fátima and João
Page 23 and 24:
1. IntroductionThis research studie
Page 25 and 26:
3translator can understand the mean
Page 27 and 28:
5theoretical frameworks that have b
Page 29 and 30:
2. The state of the artIn order to
Page 31 and 32:
9terminology of Canadian and Portug
Page 33 and 34:
11Translation:Legal discourse is in
Page 35 and 36:
13possible? The question of transla
Page 37 and 38:
152.1.2. GenresAccording to Gémar
Page 39 and 40:
17Genre studies are consensual in d
Page 41 and 42:
19Figure 1. Typology of legal texts
Page 43 and 44:
21the two typologies. For example,
Page 45 and 46:
23In Canada as in Portugal, dispute
Page 47 and 48:
25judgments. He argues that knowled
Page 49 and 50:
27Maingueneau (2004) for whom build
Page 51 and 52:
29find equivalents in a systematic
Page 53 and 54:
31(2005) and most recently in Adams
Page 55 and 56:
33the langue-related concept of equ
Page 57 and 58:
352.2.1.2. Concepts and designation
Page 59 and 60:
37in Hartmann and James (1998: 51)
Page 61 and 62:
392.2.1.4. Semantic content and col
Page 63 and 64:
41―Vocabulary type‖ refers to r
Page 65 and 66:
43A concept can only be understood
Page 67 and 68:
45assistance to identify and valida
Page 69 and 70:
47(intertextual). Cop (1991: 2776)
Page 71 and 72:
49Functional equivalenceZgusta (198
Page 73 and 74:
51particular purpose in mind: ―Ä
Page 75 and 76:
53Table 2. Anisomorphism: example o
Page 77 and 78:
55in such a way that they are compo
Page 79 and 80:
572.2.3. Qualitative and quantitati
Page 81 and 82:
59be cases of full equivalence with
Page 83 and 84:
Graphicalrepresentation of therelat
Page 85 and 86:
63For instance, in Figure 10 saudad
Page 87 and 88:
65Another example of insufficient c
Page 89 and 90:
67appears and then skims texts in t
Page 91 and 92:
69equivalents but she also maintain
Page 93 and 94:
71defined by taking into account th
Page 95 and 96:
73Among these studies, some contrib
Page 97 and 98:
75other words or sequences of words
Page 99 and 100:
77The third type of verbs, i.e. pol
Page 101 and 102:
79author applied to the selection o
Page 103 and 104:
81represent synonymy, antonymy, nom
Page 105 and 106:
83contexts, but also a hyperlink ca
Page 107 and 108:
85The typology of verbs appearing i
Page 109 and 110:
87Phraseological verbs are predicat
Page 111 and 112:
89temperature rises; the air circul
Page 113 and 114:
91examples, they state that discurs
Page 115 and 116:
93Another problem with this represe
Page 117 and 118:
95connective verbs are simple verbs
Page 119 and 120:
97different. The criteria designed
Page 121 and 122:
99to show the mismatch that occurs
Page 123 and 124:
101content from the perspective of
Page 125 and 126:
103mesma quantia global, de 6151000
Page 127 and 128:
105entities with authority to trans
Page 129 and 130:
107Nevertheless, Pimentel and L‘H
Page 131 and 132:
109In 1995, L‘Homme proposes a me
Page 133 and 134:
111these reasons, we believe it rem
Page 135 and 136:
113But in order to understand Frame
Page 137 and 138:
115Par exemple, les règles de sous
Page 139 and 140:
117the nature of language‖, that
Page 141 and 142:
119This kind of understanding by th
Page 143 and 144:
121Firstly, according to him, seman
Page 145 and 146:
123exchanging the goods for money (
Page 147 and 148:
125As mentioned in the previous sec
Page 149 and 150:
127Quarreling:(3, 9) the participan
Page 151 and 152:
129corresponds to a semantic type w
Page 153 and 154:
131Figure 21. Lexical entry report
Page 155 and 156:
133parent frame. The frame [Quarrel
Page 157 and 158:
1353.2.2.2. Environmental ScienceAn
Page 159 and 160:
137Figure 23. The Coastal Engineeri
Page 161 and 162:
139Spanish terms that are reported
Page 163 and 164:
141the FrameNet methodology will be
Page 165 and 166:
143Agnoloni et al. (2010). Followin
Page 167 and 168:
145scenes: ―Whereas a scene is de
Page 169 and 170:
Table 9. Confirming cross-linguisti
Page 171 and 172:
149Table 10. Summary of the annotat
Page 173 and 174:
151Contrary to the FrameNet approac
Page 175 and 176:
153Also, in an article entitled ―
Page 177 and 178:
155support for the characterization
Page 179 and 180:
157period in which the texts were w
Page 181 and 182:
159for Brazilian Portuguese). The E
Page 183 and 184:
161case. In its written form, an ac
Page 185 and 186:
163Table 14. Beginning of the thema
Page 187 and 188:
165The decisão is the final sectio
Page 189 and 190:
167In order to identify the content
Page 191 and 192:
1694.1.3.3. ExpertsAll authors of t
Page 193 and 194:
171The ―Introduction‖ states th
Page 195 and 196:
173favourable decisions are quite s
Page 197 and 198:
1754.1.4.1. FunctionPortuguese and
Page 199 and 200:
177semble impliquer qu‘ils doiven
Page 201 and 202:
179Figure 24. Bottom-up approach4.3
Page 203 and 204:
181Despite this word of caution, we
Page 205 and 206:
183evokes the last stage of the cri
Page 207 and 208:
185Finally, some candidate terms we
Page 209 and 210:
187Due to the differences in the nu
Page 211 and 212:
189making an oral agreement. In thi
Page 213 and 214:
191is a substantially higher one th
Page 215 and 216:
193concur 1L'Heureux-Dubé J. disse
Page 217 and 218:
195Although the occurrences of the
Page 219 and 220:
197[Constitutionality]infringe 1 ,
Page 221 and 222:
199Table 18. comply 1 , infringe 1
Page 223 and 224:
201have the same number and type of
Page 225 and 226:
203< FE nom="">< FE nom="">vtFigure
Page 227 and 228:
205After hearing his alibi evidence
Page 229 and 230:
207declarar 1Como é sabido, o Trib
Page 231 and 232:
209Sometimes the target term shares
Page 233 and 234:
211FEs that correspond to prepositi
Page 235 and 236:
213the hearing judgeFigure 40. Anno
Page 237 and 238:
215the indication of the reference.
Page 239 and 240:
217the first meaning was related to
Page 241 and 242:
219cumprir 1 ; 2) exceed 1 and viol
Page 243 and 244:
221the semantic nature of the terms
Page 245 and 246:
Portuguese223Agency, authority, BNS
Page 247 and 248:
2255.1.1. Portuguese termsCandidate
Page 249 and 250:
2276. Ambiguity between the past pa
Page 251 and 252:
229a legal genre set out in the fir
Page 253 and 254:
231as Prata (2005) and Prata et al.
Page 255 and 256:
2331. Ambiguity between the past fo
Page 257 and 258:
235(section 5.1.1.2.1); the second
Page 259 and 260:
237corpus, the action of adducing i
Page 261 and 262:
239draw some considerations on the
Page 263 and 264:
241extraction of Portuguese terms b
Page 265 and 266:
243The second half of the frame des
Page 267 and 268:
Portuguese245artigo, lei, lei pream
Page 269 and 270:
247We can observe that both terms e
Page 271 and 272:
249the core FEs correspond to the a
Page 273 and 274:
251resolve 1[1] This Court can reso
Page 275 and 276:
253are not responsible for applying
Page 277 and 278:
255Table 27. Linguistic realization
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
263Table 33 illustrates that the se
Page 287 and 288:
265Tabela 35. Linguistic realizatio
Page 289 and 290: 267LAW and ISSUE. For all these rea
Page 291 and 292: PortugueseEnglsih269Table 36. amend
Page 293 and 294: 271The application of the aforement
Page 295 and 296: 273propugnar 1Por último, na conte
Page 297 and 298: PortugueseEnglish275Table 37. The f
Page 299 and 300: 277The following pairs of verbs are
Page 301 and 302: 279This frame groups together one E
Page 303 and 304: 281The scenario includes two core F
Page 305 and 306: PortugueseEnglish283For instance, a
Page 307 and 308: 285Translation:* Este Tribunal pode
Page 309 and 310: English287Table 42. The [Order] fra
Page 311 and 312: 289considered candidate equivalents
Page 313 and 314: 291Supreme Court judgments not only
Page 315 and 316: 293Figure 45. Alphabetical list of
Page 317 and 318: 295As in DiCoInfo (L‘Homme 2008),
Page 319 and 320: 297the term dismiss 1 the actantial
Page 321 and 322: 299In the annotated contexts (Figur
Page 323 and 324: 301expression in sentences containi
Page 325 and 326: 303Finally, as the task of annotati
Page 327 and 328: 305The study started with the revie
Page 329 and 330: 307As the research specifically aim
Page 331 and 332: 309study: a larger amount of terms;
Page 333 and 334: 311Atkins, S. and M. Rundell (2008)
Page 335 and 336: 313Carreno, I. (2005). Analyse de l
Page 337 and 338: 315Devinat, M. (2005). La règle pr
Page 339: 317Fontenelle, T. (2000). ―A Bili
Page 343 and 344: 321L‘Homme, M.-C. (2003). ―Capt
Page 345 and 346: 323McEnery, A. and Z. Xiao (2007).
Page 347 and 348: 325Reimerink, A. and P. Faber. (200
Page 349 and 350: 327Searle, J. (1983). Intentionalit
Page 351 and 352: 329Terminologiewissenschaft = Langu
Page 353 and 354: IIDecisão Texto Integral:Acordam n
Page 355 and 356: IVAppendix 2. Indexing terms of the
Page 357 and 358: Appendix 3. A Canadian judgmentVISU
Page 359 and 360: VIIIof stolen property from six to
Page 361 and 362: Appendix 4. Indexing terms of the C
Page 363 and 364: XIIAppendix 6. Partial list of Engl
Page 365 and 366: XIVFrame and definition Core Frame
Page 367 and 368: XVIFrame and definition Core Frame
Page 369 and 370: XVIIIFrame and definition Core Fram
Page 371 and 372: XXFrame and definition Core Frame E
Page 373 and 374: XXIIFrame and definition Core Frame
Page 375 and 376: XXIVFrame and definition Core Frame
Page 377 and 378: XXVIFrame and definition Core Frame
Page 379 and 380: XXVIIIFrame and definition Core Fra
Page 381 and 382: XXXFrame and definition Core Frame
Page 383 and 384: XXXIIFrame and definition Core Fram
Page 385 and 386: XXXIVFrame and definition Core Fram
Page 387 and 388: XXXVIAppendix 8. Partial list of th
Page 389 and 390: XXXVIIIargue 1 [Argumentation]Charg
Page 391 and 392:
XLdeem 1 [Judging]Irregularity Core
Page 393 and 394:
XLIIManner Non-core impugn 1 [Conte
Page 395 and 396:
XLIVRight Core assert 3 [Right]Text
Page 397 and 398:
Appendix 10. List of common indirec
Page 399 and 400:
Appendix 11. Data validationXLVIIIV
Page 401 and 402:
Appendix 12. Eliminated candidate t
Page 403 and 404:
Appendix 14. List of Portuguese ter
Page 405 and 406:
48. exercer 2 [Disagreement] exerce
Page 407 and 408:
Appendix 15. List of English termsL
Page 409 and 410:
estipular 1 , prescrever 154. grant
Page 411 and 412:
Appendix 16. List of frames groupin
Page 413 and 414:
LXII37. declarar 1 , state 1 [Argum
show all

UniversitÃ© de MontrÃ©al - ThÃ¨se sous forme numÃ©rique

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?