Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

XLIIIProtagonist Core exceed 1 [Compliance]The Court of Appeal exceeded the limits of appellate reviewand unduly extended the scope of fiduciary obligations.infringe 2 [Compliance]The HRT found that by rejecting it on that basis, the SPCUMhad infringed s. 18.2 of the Charter.violate 2 [Compliance]Purpose Non-core invoke 1 [Argumentation]Reason Non-core acquit 1 [Verdict]Did the Agency Violate VIA's Right to Procedural Fairness?Sergeant Beaudry invoked Mr. Plourde's health to justify hisdecision.person, crown, judge, appellant, party, accused, court, respondent,police, city, employer, he, agency, government, canada, employee,arbitrator, him, they, firm, individual, via, company, body,parliament, member, child, state, bns, counsel, official, anyone,attorney general, officer, witness, her, you, worker, mr. khadr,province, slc, cvmm, lieutenant governor in council, société, csis,owner, spcum, authority, irpa, alliance, citizen, complainant, privacycommissioner, samson, trustee, administrator, crtc, legislature,defendant, mr. dinardo, mr. last, police chief, police officer, suspect,stranger, fugitive, mr. bjelland, agbc, bank, domtar, euro-excellence,h.l., one, sanofi, jury, licensee, minister, survivor, them, canadianradio-television and telecommunication commision, kci, double n,kerry, licensor, media, minor, sureway, work, davis, s, bidder,counterpart, cra, issuer, offender, mr. khosa, saaq, telus, claimant,mr. keays, mr. singh, provider, union, corporation, minister ofjustice, wal-mart, defence, detainee, ermineskin, resident,association, creditor, federal court, supplier, advocate, committee,constable ferguson, dell, united states, chief, spouse, adjudicator,court of appeal, longueuil, smith j.a., vpa, plaintiff, mechanic,municipality, rcmpInf-clauseAfter hearing his alibi evidence, the trial judge acquitted himon both counts, stating as follows (at p. 813): It is quiteapparent that perjury has been committed in this Court room.The defence argued that the accused should be acquittedbecause it was more likely than not that his blood alcoholconcentration was below 80 mg at the relevant time.