11.07.2015 Views

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24explain that after the police investigation (in which the author of the crime is charged)the parties should present all their consi<strong>de</strong>rations, report the facts in <strong>de</strong>tail, and <strong>de</strong>scribewhat happened from the opening of the police inquiry to the moment of the closingargument. The basic function of the closing argument is to request the <strong>de</strong>fendant‘sconviction or acquittal and/or the reduction of the sentence. The parties should constructtheir thesis (of accusation and <strong>de</strong>fence) according to the types of crimes <strong>de</strong>fined by thePenal Co<strong>de</strong>, because penalties will be applied according to this classification. The judge<strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>s which request from the parties is more valid, taking into account theirarguments. When the parties are not satisfied with the outcome of the judge‘s <strong>de</strong>cisionthey can appeal to Courts of Criminal Appeal.Studies on judgments have focused on several of the aspects that characterizethis legal genre. Bhatia (1993) and Maley (1985) have concentrated on themacrostructure of judgments, on the realization of its communicative purposes throughlanguage, and on their intertextual characteristics. In particular, Bhatia (1989) hasargued that this kind of information can be useful for teaching English for Aca<strong>de</strong>micPurposes. The author (1993: 118) explains that legal cases display a four-movestructure, which corresponds to its conventionalized internal structure and fulfilscommunicative purposes. In move one, the case is i<strong>de</strong>ntified. In move two, the facts ofthe case are i<strong>de</strong>ntified. In move three, the case is argued by stating the history of thecase, by presenting the arguments, and by <strong>de</strong>riving ratio <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>ndi (the principle of lawthat the judge wished to set down for application to future cases of a similar<strong>de</strong>scription). Finally, move four corresponds to the final <strong>de</strong>cision.Judgments have also been studied from a bilingual/binational point of view. Forinstance, Engberg (1997) compared the linguistic and textual conventions of Danish andGerman judgments, namely by investigating the speech acts per<strong>forme</strong>d within the genreso as to point to differences in the use of these <strong>de</strong>vices in German and Danish

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!