11.07.2015 Views

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

264sentence, i.e. It announces rewards and punishments, evokes the [Granting] and the[Verdict] frames. The FE LAW is mandatory in the frames [Or<strong>de</strong>r] and [Authorization] andthe FE JUDGE, the representative of LAW, is mandatory in the frames [Granting] and[Verdict].Also un<strong>de</strong>rlined in the <strong>de</strong>finition is the i<strong>de</strong>a that the law inclu<strong>de</strong>s the <strong>de</strong>cisions ofcourts of justice, as well as acts of the legislature. Although we mentioned in the first partof chapter 4 that the <strong>de</strong>cisions of courts of justice have a more important weight on the<strong>de</strong>terminations of Canadian judges, we can observe from the comparison between Table 34and Tabela 35 that the <strong>de</strong>cisions of courts of justice occur as instantiations of the FE LAWin both the English and Portuguese corpora (e.g. <strong>de</strong>cision and <strong>de</strong>cisão).Table 34. Linguistic realizations of the core FE LAW in the English corpus

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!