XLIJudge Core apply 1 [Apply law]A number of other differences relate to rules that a judge canapply to a young person.convict 1 [Verdict]Law Core apply 1 [Apply law]A jury convicted him of manslaughter by criminal negligenceand acquitted him of manslaughter by failing to provi<strong>de</strong> thenecessaries of life.In the meantime, this Court must apply the Act that Parliamenthas given us.infringe 2 [Compliance]The HRT found that by rejecting it on that basis, the SPCUMhad infringed s. 18.2 of the Charter.violate 2 [Compliance]Did the Agency violate VIA's Right to Procedural Fairness?management, proceedings, promotion, release, relation, age,amendment, argument, by-law, circumstance, <strong>de</strong>bt, problem,reputation, repute, standard of review, testimony, claim, commonlaw, inci<strong>de</strong>nt, paragraph, propensity, replacement, inf-clause, thatclausejudge, court, i, jury, court of appeal, he, we, arbitrator, majority,agency, minister,ontario court of appeal, colleague, giroux j.a., chamberland j.a.,mclachlin j., pelletier j.a., rosenberg j.a., charron j., forget, goudgej.a., low j.a., mackenzie j.a., morissette jj.a., customs, expert, fe<strong>de</strong>ralcourt, government, laskin j.a., <strong>de</strong>cision maker, quebec court ofappeal, they, legislation, section, ycja, commissioner, manitobacourt of appeal, quebec superior court, superior court, britishcolumbia court of appeal, divisional court, judge beaulieu, ryan j.a.,one, crtc, tribunal, fe<strong>de</strong>ral court of appeal, charge, garrow b., conradj.a., doyon j.a., justice ryan, kyle j., slatter j.a., adjudicator, planningcommittee, spcum, campbell j., côté j.a., doherty j.a.section, provision, law, rule, act, charter, legislation, principle, court,regulation, standard, parliament, statute, judge, legislature,amendment, article,right, <strong>de</strong>cision, agreement, constitution, doctrine, requirement,common law, power, obligation, or<strong>de</strong>r, co<strong>de</strong>, measure, freedom,guarantee, liberty, security, copyright, policy, presumption, test,remedy, charge, clause, evi<strong>de</strong>nce, city, state, civil co<strong>de</strong> of québec,commissioner, contract, government of canada, minister of justice,plan, quebec superior court, statutory scheme, paragraph,prohibition, unavailability, ability, protection, patent, admission,discretion, part, procedure, geneva conventions, letter of the law,duty, un<strong>de</strong>rtaking, curative proviso, ait, chapter, faa, indian act,school trustee statutes amendment act, tax, form, four books appeal,element, prong, review, stage, canada elections act, bylaw, newbrunswick human rights co<strong>de</strong>, absence of evi<strong>de</strong>nce, british columbiafamily relations act, contravention, i, issue estoppel, subsection,claim, <strong>de</strong>claration, refusal, court of appeal, court of queen's bench,fe<strong>de</strong>ral court, minister, case law, grant, purpose, reason, scheme,
XLIIManner Non-core impugn 1 [Contesting]He proceeds to impugn the accuracy of sniffer dogs generally,by drawing on data gathered by the New South WalesOmbudsman, Review of the Police Powers (Drug DetectionDogs) Act 2001 (2006), concluding at para. 87: "In the snifferdogbusiness, there are many variables.That was the issue on which Ms. Bowles had been subjected toan extensive cross-examination which seriously impugned thereliability of her evi<strong>de</strong>nce.convention, alberta, hcda, british columbia court of appeal, canadatransportation act, equity, jurispru<strong>de</strong>nce, liability scheme, rail co<strong>de</strong>,canadian charter of rights and freedoms, condition, fairness, letter,oath of office, sentence, term, arbitrator, indictment, proceeding,licence, administrative body, government, governor in council,authority, bound, function, gui<strong>de</strong>line, jurisdiction, limit, mandate,scope, threshold, financial administration act, local authoritieselection act, miranda, progeny, criminal co<strong>de</strong>, emergencymanagement actbroadly, correctly, differently, extent, fashion, liability, regularly,un<strong>de</strong>rstandingviolate 2 [Compliance]Means Non-core impugn 1 [Contesting]I conclu<strong>de</strong> that the IRPA unjustifiably violates s. 7 of theCharter.For example, the respon<strong>de</strong>nt seeks to impugn Mr. Kong'scredibility by pointing to his inability to accurately <strong>de</strong>scribe hisinjuries in a manner consistent with the medical records.He proceeds to impugn the accuracy of sniffer dogs generally,by drawing on data gathered by the New South WalesOmbudsman, Review of the Police Powers (Drug DetectionDogs) Act 2001 (2006), concluding at para. 87: "In the snifferdogbusiness, there are many variables.
- Page 3 and 4:
Université de MontréalFaculté de
- Page 5 and 6:
iiiframework to the compilation of
- Page 7 and 8:
vd‘autres contributions ayant dé
- Page 9 and 10:
vii2.3.1. The theory of classes of
- Page 12 and 13:
x5.3.1. Full equivalents ..........
- Page 14:
xiiTable 23. The frame [Proof] grou
- Page 19 and 20:
xviiTypographical conventionsTerms:
- Page 21 and 22:
xixTo my parents, Fátima and João
- Page 23 and 24:
1. IntroductionThis research studie
- Page 25 and 26:
3translator can understand the mean
- Page 27 and 28:
5theoretical frameworks that have b
- Page 29 and 30:
2. The state of the artIn order to
- Page 31 and 32:
9terminology of Canadian and Portug
- Page 33 and 34:
11Translation:Legal discourse is in
- Page 35 and 36:
13possible? The question of transla
- Page 37 and 38:
152.1.2. GenresAccording to Gémar
- Page 39 and 40:
17Genre studies are consensual in d
- Page 41 and 42:
19Figure 1. Typology of legal texts
- Page 43 and 44:
21the two typologies. For example,
- Page 45 and 46:
23In Canada as in Portugal, dispute
- Page 47 and 48:
25judgments. He argues that knowled
- Page 49 and 50:
27Maingueneau (2004) for whom build
- Page 51 and 52:
29find equivalents in a systematic
- Page 53 and 54:
31(2005) and most recently in Adams
- Page 55 and 56:
33the langue-related concept of equ
- Page 57 and 58:
352.2.1.2. Concepts and designation
- Page 59 and 60:
37in Hartmann and James (1998: 51)
- Page 61 and 62:
392.2.1.4. Semantic content and col
- Page 63 and 64:
41―Vocabulary type‖ refers to r
- Page 65 and 66:
43A concept can only be understood
- Page 67 and 68:
45assistance to identify and valida
- Page 69 and 70:
47(intertextual). Cop (1991: 2776)
- Page 71 and 72:
49Functional equivalenceZgusta (198
- Page 73 and 74:
51particular purpose in mind: ―Ä
- Page 75 and 76:
53Table 2. Anisomorphism: example o
- Page 77 and 78:
55in such a way that they are compo
- Page 79 and 80:
572.2.3. Qualitative and quantitati
- Page 81 and 82:
59be cases of full equivalence with
- Page 83 and 84:
Graphicalrepresentation of therelat
- Page 85 and 86:
63For instance, in Figure 10 saudad
- Page 87 and 88:
65Another example of insufficient c
- Page 89 and 90:
67appears and then skims texts in t
- Page 91 and 92:
69equivalents but she also maintain
- Page 93 and 94:
71defined by taking into account th
- Page 95 and 96:
73Among these studies, some contrib
- Page 97 and 98:
75other words or sequences of words
- Page 99 and 100:
77The third type of verbs, i.e. pol
- Page 101 and 102:
79author applied to the selection o
- Page 103 and 104:
81represent synonymy, antonymy, nom
- Page 105 and 106:
83contexts, but also a hyperlink ca
- Page 107 and 108:
85The typology of verbs appearing i
- Page 109 and 110:
87Phraseological verbs are predicat
- Page 111 and 112:
89temperature rises; the air circul
- Page 113 and 114:
91examples, they state that discurs
- Page 115 and 116:
93Another problem with this represe
- Page 117 and 118:
95connective verbs are simple verbs
- Page 119 and 120:
97different. The criteria designed
- Page 121 and 122:
99to show the mismatch that occurs
- Page 123 and 124:
101content from the perspective of
- Page 125 and 126:
103mesma quantia global, de 6151000
- Page 127 and 128:
105entities with authority to trans
- Page 129 and 130:
107Nevertheless, Pimentel and L‘H
- Page 131 and 132:
109In 1995, L‘Homme proposes a me
- Page 133 and 134:
111these reasons, we believe it rem
- Page 135 and 136:
113But in order to understand Frame
- Page 137 and 138:
115Par exemple, les règles de sous
- Page 139 and 140:
117the nature of language‖, that
- Page 141 and 142:
119This kind of understanding by th
- Page 143 and 144:
121Firstly, according to him, seman
- Page 145 and 146:
123exchanging the goods for money (
- Page 147 and 148:
125As mentioned in the previous sec
- Page 149 and 150:
127Quarreling:(3, 9) the participan
- Page 151 and 152:
129corresponds to a semantic type w
- Page 153 and 154:
131Figure 21. Lexical entry report
- Page 155 and 156:
133parent frame. The frame [Quarrel
- Page 157 and 158:
1353.2.2.2. Environmental ScienceAn
- Page 159 and 160:
137Figure 23. The Coastal Engineeri
- Page 161 and 162:
139Spanish terms that are reported
- Page 163 and 164:
141the FrameNet methodology will be
- Page 165 and 166:
143Agnoloni et al. (2010). Followin
- Page 167 and 168:
145scenes: ―Whereas a scene is de
- Page 169 and 170:
Table 9. Confirming cross-linguisti
- Page 171 and 172:
149Table 10. Summary of the annotat
- Page 173 and 174:
151Contrary to the FrameNet approac
- Page 175 and 176:
153Also, in an article entitled ―
- Page 177 and 178:
155support for the characterization
- Page 179 and 180:
157period in which the texts were w
- Page 181 and 182:
159for Brazilian Portuguese). The E
- Page 183 and 184:
161case. In its written form, an ac
- Page 185 and 186:
163Table 14. Beginning of the thema
- Page 187 and 188:
165The decisão is the final sectio
- Page 189 and 190:
167In order to identify the content
- Page 191 and 192:
1694.1.3.3. ExpertsAll authors of t
- Page 193 and 194:
171The ―Introduction‖ states th
- Page 195 and 196:
173favourable decisions are quite s
- Page 197 and 198:
1754.1.4.1. FunctionPortuguese and
- Page 199 and 200:
177semble impliquer qu‘ils doiven
- Page 201 and 202:
179Figure 24. Bottom-up approach4.3
- Page 203 and 204:
181Despite this word of caution, we
- Page 205 and 206:
183evokes the last stage of the cri
- Page 207 and 208:
185Finally, some candidate terms we
- Page 209 and 210:
187Due to the differences in the nu
- Page 211 and 212:
189making an oral agreement. In thi
- Page 213 and 214:
191is a substantially higher one th
- Page 215 and 216:
193concur 1L'Heureux-Dubé J. disse
- Page 217 and 218:
195Although the occurrences of the
- Page 219 and 220:
197[Constitutionality]infringe 1 ,
- Page 221 and 222:
199Table 18. comply 1 , infringe 1
- Page 223 and 224:
201have the same number and type of
- Page 225 and 226:
203< FE nom="">< FE nom="">vtFigure
- Page 227 and 228:
205After hearing his alibi evidence
- Page 229 and 230:
207declarar 1Como é sabido, o Trib
- Page 231 and 232:
209Sometimes the target term shares
- Page 233 and 234:
211FEs that correspond to prepositi
- Page 235 and 236:
213the hearing judgeFigure 40. Anno
- Page 237 and 238:
215the indication of the reference.
- Page 239 and 240:
217the first meaning was related to
- Page 241 and 242:
219cumprir 1 ; 2) exceed 1 and viol
- Page 243 and 244:
221the semantic nature of the terms
- Page 245 and 246:
Portuguese223Agency, authority, BNS
- Page 247 and 248:
2255.1.1. Portuguese termsCandidate
- Page 249 and 250:
2276. Ambiguity between the past pa
- Page 251 and 252:
229a legal genre set out in the fir
- Page 253 and 254:
231as Prata (2005) and Prata et al.
- Page 255 and 256:
2331. Ambiguity between the past fo
- Page 257 and 258:
235(section 5.1.1.2.1); the second
- Page 259 and 260:
237corpus, the action of adducing i
- Page 261 and 262:
239draw some considerations on the
- Page 263 and 264:
241extraction of Portuguese terms b
- Page 265 and 266:
243The second half of the frame des
- Page 267 and 268:
Portuguese245artigo, lei, lei pream
- Page 269 and 270:
247We can observe that both terms e
- Page 271 and 272:
249the core FEs correspond to the a
- Page 273 and 274:
251resolve 1[1] This Court can reso
- Page 275 and 276:
253are not responsible for applying
- Page 277 and 278:
255Table 27. Linguistic realization
- Page 279 and 280:
257Table 28. Linguistic realization
- Page 281 and 282:
259Table 30. Linguistic realization
- Page 283 and 284:
261Table 32. Linguistic realization
- Page 285 and 286:
263Table 33 illustrates that the se
- Page 287 and 288:
265Tabela 35. Linguistic realizatio
- Page 289 and 290:
267LAW and ISSUE. For all these rea
- Page 291 and 292:
PortugueseEnglsih269Table 36. amend
- Page 293 and 294:
271The application of the aforement
- Page 295 and 296:
273propugnar 1Por último, na conte
- Page 297 and 298:
PortugueseEnglish275Table 37. The f
- Page 299 and 300:
277The following pairs of verbs are
- Page 301 and 302:
279This frame groups together one E
- Page 303 and 304:
281The scenario includes two core F
- Page 305 and 306:
PortugueseEnglish283For instance, a
- Page 307 and 308:
285Translation:* Este Tribunal pode
- Page 309 and 310:
English287Table 42. The [Order] fra
- Page 311 and 312:
289considered candidate equivalents
- Page 313 and 314:
291Supreme Court judgments not only
- Page 315 and 316:
293Figure 45. Alphabetical list of
- Page 317 and 318:
295As in DiCoInfo (L‘Homme 2008),
- Page 319 and 320:
297the term dismiss 1 the actantial
- Page 321 and 322:
299In the annotated contexts (Figur
- Page 323 and 324:
301expression in sentences containi
- Page 325 and 326:
303Finally, as the task of annotati
- Page 327 and 328:
305The study started with the revie
- Page 329 and 330:
307As the research specifically aim
- Page 331 and 332:
309study: a larger amount of terms;
- Page 333 and 334:
311Atkins, S. and M. Rundell (2008)
- Page 335 and 336:
313Carreno, I. (2005). Analyse de l
- Page 337 and 338:
315Devinat, M. (2005). La règle pr
- Page 339 and 340:
317Fontenelle, T. (2000). ―A Bili
- Page 341 and 342: 319Gross, G. and F. Guenthner (2002
- Page 343 and 344: 321L‘Homme, M.-C. (2003). ―Capt
- Page 345 and 346: 323McEnery, A. and Z. Xiao (2007).
- Page 347 and 348: 325Reimerink, A. and P. Faber. (200
- Page 349 and 350: 327Searle, J. (1983). Intentionalit
- Page 351 and 352: 329Terminologiewissenschaft = Langu
- Page 353 and 354: IIDecisão Texto Integral:Acordam n
- Page 355 and 356: IVAppendix 2. Indexing terms of the
- Page 357 and 358: Appendix 3. A Canadian judgmentVISU
- Page 359 and 360: VIIIof stolen property from six to
- Page 361 and 362: Appendix 4. Indexing terms of the C
- Page 363 and 364: XIIAppendix 6. Partial list of Engl
- Page 365 and 366: XIVFrame and definition Core Frame
- Page 367 and 368: XVIFrame and definition Core Frame
- Page 369 and 370: XVIIIFrame and definition Core Fram
- Page 371 and 372: XXFrame and definition Core Frame E
- Page 373 and 374: XXIIFrame and definition Core Frame
- Page 375 and 376: XXIVFrame and definition Core Frame
- Page 377 and 378: XXVIFrame and definition Core Frame
- Page 379 and 380: XXVIIIFrame and definition Core Fra
- Page 381 and 382: XXXFrame and definition Core Frame
- Page 383 and 384: XXXIIFrame and definition Core Fram
- Page 385 and 386: XXXIVFrame and definition Core Fram
- Page 387 and 388: XXXVIAppendix 8. Partial list of th
- Page 389 and 390: XXXVIIIargue 1 [Argumentation]Charg
- Page 391: XLdeem 1 [Judging]Irregularity Core
- Page 395 and 396: XLIVRight Core assert 3 [Right]Text
- Page 397 and 398: Appendix 10. List of common indirec
- Page 399 and 400: Appendix 11. Data validationXLVIIIV
- Page 401 and 402: Appendix 12. Eliminated candidate t
- Page 403 and 404: Appendix 14. List of Portuguese ter
- Page 405 and 406: 48. exercer 2 [Disagreement] exerce
- Page 407 and 408: Appendix 15. List of English termsL
- Page 409 and 410: estipular 1 , prescrever 154. grant
- Page 411 and 412: Appendix 16. List of frames groupin
- Page 413 and 414: LXII37. declarar 1 , state 1 [Argum