Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

193concur 1L'Heureux-Dubé J. dissented in Cook, and McLachlin J. concurred in her reasons.acquit 1The judge acquitted him of murder but convicted him of manslaughter.Other paradigmatic relations. Contexts were selected when terms holdingother types of paradigmatic relations with target terms such as hyperonymy werepresent. Paradigmatically related terms may help better circumscribe specificmeanings of target terms, i.e. they may provide clues about the frames evokedby target terms.acquit 1The accused was acquitted at trial and the verdict was overturned on appeal.Subject field information. Contexts were selected when they containedinformation related to the subject field. This information may be useful tounderstand the frames evoked by target terms.acquit 1A person who is acquitted of an indictable offence other than by reason of a verdictof not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder and whose acquittal isset aside by the court of appeal may appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada.4.3.5. Actantial structuresActantial structures are representations used to describe the number and organization of theactants of terms and, in certain theoretical frameworks, their role with regard to them.Semantic actants are obligatory participants in the meaning of terms and, as such, they areassumed to correspond to core elements of the frames evoked by terms (the identificationand description of frames will be dealt with in the following section). Actantial structuresroughly correspond to a canonical list of actants and, although FrameNet only indirectly