Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

PortugueseEnglish275Table 37. The frame [Case transfer] groups together the partial equivalents remit 1 andtransitar 2Frame:Case transferDefinition:A court (COURT1) transfers a case or a matter (CASE) to another court (COURT2) for furtherconsideration or decision.Core FEs:COURT1 – The Court from which the CASE is transferred.CASE – The CASE that is transferred from one court to another.COURT2– The Court to which the CASE is transferred, usually an appellate court or a specializedcourt.Non-core FEs:BASIS, PURPOSE, REASON, TIMEContexts:Accordingly, we would allow the appeal on this point with costs throughout, and remit the matterto the Federal Court of Appeal for consideration of the two remaining issues.Transitam para o juízo de família e menores de Estarreja, à data da instalação do mesmo, osprocessos que, nesta área, se encontrem pendentes nos tribunais das comarcas de Estarreja eOvar.COURT1 Terms CASE COURT2court, Court ofAppeal, I,Sexton J. A.,weremit 1case, issue,matterAgency, arbitrator, Board of Enquiry, CanadianInternational Trade Tribunal, Federal Court ofAppeal, judge, minister, Claims ResolutionTribunal, Superior Court, Tax CourtSubject, NP Object, NP Complement, PP-----------processo Comarca de Lisboa, juizotransitar 2Subject, NPComplement, PPBecause remit 1 and transitar 2 do not have the same number of actants and becausethis raises translation problems, they were considered partial equivalents. In fact, some ofthe equivalents pairs that display differences in the number of actants correspond tosituations in which one of the verbs is transitive whereas the other is intransitive such as theone illustrated in Table 37, but this is not always the case. Consider, for instance, apply 4and interpor 1 in the Appellate procedure frame illustrated in Table 38.