Université de Montréal - Thèse sous forme numérique

207declarar 1Como é sabido, o Tribunal Constitucional, no Acórdão 743/96, declarou ainconstitucionalidade do art. 2.° do CC na parte em que este atribuía força aostribunais para emitir leis (doutrina que tinha força obrigatória geral), competênciaque os tribunais não podiam ter, uma vez que tal competência cabe ao poderlegislativo.Translation:As it is known, the Constitutional Court, in the 743/96 judgment, declared theinconstitutionality of s. 2 of the CC in the part in which the former granted courtsthe power to enact laws (a doctrine that was generally enforceable), a power that thecourts could not exercise because it pertains to the legislative power.Similarly, impose 1 evokes a frame in which three FEs are mandatory: JUDGE orLAW, DUTY and PROTAGONIST. In most cases, all three FEs are instantiated in each contextof the term, but in the context below the core FE DUTY is split in two parts, i.e. anobligation and to disclose material which..., by the core FE PROTAGONIST on the Crown:impose 1The law cannot impose an obligation on the Crown to disclose material which itdoes not have or cannot obtain: R. v. Stinchcombe, [1995] 1 S.C.R. 754.is annotated.Again, in this kind of situations, only the FE that corresponds to the head of the NPSyntactic functions of the FEsThe syntactic annotation of the FEs appears between the tags . These tags contain a mandatory attribute called name that describesthe type of syntactic function. Instead of using FrameNet‘s complex system of labels ofsyntactic functions, the simpler set of labels that is used in the annotation of contexts inDiCoInfo was adopted: ―Subject‖ (Figure 29), ―Object‖ (Figure 29), ―Complement‖ (Figure29), ―Modifier‖ (Figure 30), ―Head‖ (Figure 31) and ―Indirect Link‖ (Figure 31).