08.02.2013 Views

The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. New MSGs have been issued in mid-1950s, mid-1960s, early<br />

1970s, mid-1980s, <strong>and</strong> in 1993. See Finkelstein, “China’s N<strong>at</strong>ional<br />

Military Str<strong>at</strong>egy,” p. 93.<br />

6. Andrew Scobell, “Why the People’s <strong>Army</strong> Fired on the<br />

People: <strong>The</strong> Chinese Military <strong>and</strong> Tiananmen,” Armed Forces <strong>and</strong><br />

Society, Vol. 18, No. 1, Winter 1992, pp. 194-195. <strong>The</strong> term is th<strong>at</strong><br />

of Robin Allison Remington who used it to describe the communist<br />

era armed forces of Yugoslavia. See her “Political-Military<br />

Rel<strong>at</strong>ions in Post-Tito Yugoslavia,” in Pedro Ramet, ed., Yugoslavia<br />

in the 1980s, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985, p. 57. Typically,<br />

civil-military rel<strong>at</strong>ions in communist party-st<strong>at</strong>es have been<br />

described as approxim<strong>at</strong>ing a “penetr<strong>at</strong>ion” model in which the<br />

party controls the military by penetr<strong>at</strong>ing it. This term is Eric<br />

Nordlinger’s. See his Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups <strong>and</strong> Governments,<br />

Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977, pp. 15-18.<br />

7. For a comprehensive tre<strong>at</strong>ment of the New Historic Missions,<br />

see Daniel M. Harnett, Toward a Globally Focused Chinese Military:<br />

<strong>The</strong> Historic Missions of the Chinese Armed Forces,Alex<strong>and</strong>ria,<br />

VA: CNA Corpor<strong>at</strong>ion, 2008. While the preferred term in Chinese<br />

official transl<strong>at</strong>ions is “historical,” this author—consistent with<br />

Harnett—prefers “historic.” For a Chinese elabor<strong>at</strong>ion of the New<br />

Historic Missions, see, for example, Zheng Weiping <strong>and</strong> Liu Mingfu,<br />

eds., 军队新的历史使命论 (On the Historic Missions of the Military),<br />

Beijing, China: Renmin Wujing Chubanshe, 2005.<br />

8. See, for example, Wang Xixin, “打造与时代同步的核心军事<br />

能力 (“Forge Core Military Capabilities in Sync with the Times”),<br />

解放军报 (Liber<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>Army</strong> Daily), May 2, 2009, p. 6.<br />

9. James Mulvenon, “Chairman Hu <strong>and</strong> the <strong>PLA</strong>’s New Historic<br />

Missions,” China Leadership Monitor, No. 27, Winter 2009, p.<br />

7.<br />

10. Perhaps a more apt term would be “MOOTW with Chinese<br />

characteristics.” Whether the <strong>PLA</strong>’s conception of MOOW<br />

is significantly different to the U.S. military underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the<br />

term is an open question to be answered by further research. I am<br />

indebted to Kevin Lanzit for deepening my underst<strong>and</strong>ing of this<br />

concept.<br />

128

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!