The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

will grow increasingly difficult and will require commensurately
more varied and sophisticated tools. We
need to be able to peer further into the future to both
aid specific military planning as well as allow more
time to adjust psychologically to the inevitable strategic
shift that China’s defense industry reform will
beget.
ENDNOTES – CHAPTER 10
1. This chapter builds on a number of excellent studies. The
RAND study of China’s aerospace, aviation, shipping, and electronics/information
defense sectors broadly covers defense industry
reform from the 1998-99 reforms until 2005. For the most
comprehensive treatment of China’s civil-military integration
strategy, see Tai Ming Cheung, Fortifying China: The Struggle to
Build a Modern Defense Economy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University
Press, 2009. Defense reform more generally is covered well in
Evan Medeiros et al., A New Direction for China’s Defense Industry,
Washington, DC: Washington, DC: RAND Corporation, 2005;
Keith Crane et al., Modernizing China’s Military: Opportunities and
Constraints, Washington, DC: RAND, 2005. Other related works
on reform of the defense industry include Richard A. Bitzinger,
Towards a Brave New Arms Industry? Adelphi Paper No. 356, London,
UK: International Institute for Strategic Studies/Oxford University
Press, 2003; and “Reforming China’s Defense Industry:
Progress in Spite of Itself?” Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Fall
2007; Arthur S Ding, “Civilian-Military Relationship and Reform
in the Defense Industry,” Institute of Defense and Strategic Studies,
Singapore, June 2005; David Shambaugh, Modernizing China’s
Military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects, Berkeley: University
of California Press, 2002. In addition, a number of works associated
with defense industry reform include topics on the reform
of China’s S&T culture by Cong Cao, including “China’s Innovation
Challenge,” China’s Galloping Economy: Prospects, Problems
and Implications for the United States, Washington, DC: Woodrow
Wilson’s Asia Program; and “Zhongguancun and China’s Hightech
Parks in Transition: Growing Pains or Premature Senility?”
Asian Survey, Vol. 44, No. 5, September/October, 2004, pp. 647-66;
Denis Fred Simon and Cong Cao, China’s Emerging Technological
521