08.02.2013 Views

The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

The PLA at Home and Abroad - Strategic Studies Institute - U.S. Army

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>PLA</strong> LONG-TERM STRATEGIC CONCERNS<br />

Once one moves beyond the situ<strong>at</strong>ions across the<br />

Taiwan Strait <strong>and</strong> the Korean Peninsula, <strong>PLA</strong> concerns<br />

become more long-term <strong>and</strong> str<strong>at</strong>egic in their<br />

focus. Whether these concerns origin<strong>at</strong>e in South <strong>and</strong><br />

Central Asia, a potentially militarily powerful Russia<br />

in Asia, conflicting maritime <strong>and</strong> territorial claims in<br />

the East <strong>and</strong> South China Seas, a militarily assertive<br />

Japan, issues with the United St<strong>at</strong>es over wh<strong>at</strong> is legally<br />

permissible in terms of foreign military activities<br />

in China’s maritime Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ)<br />

<strong>and</strong> air space beyond the accepted 12-mile limit of<br />

sovereignty, the effectiveness of China’s nuclear deterrent<br />

or United St<strong>at</strong>es’ long-term intentions toward<br />

China, these are not issues where the <strong>PLA</strong> anticip<strong>at</strong>es<br />

a near-term major military confront<strong>at</strong>ion. Certainly,<br />

the <strong>PLA</strong> must be prepared for a show of force when<br />

Beijing believes it is necessary to demonstr<strong>at</strong>e China’s<br />

position on any particular issue, but not a war. <strong>The</strong>se,<br />

however, are the str<strong>at</strong>egic issues th<strong>at</strong> appear to be of<br />

most concern to the <strong>PLA</strong>. It is these long-term str<strong>at</strong>egic<br />

concerns th<strong>at</strong> now drive China’s military moderniz<strong>at</strong>ion<br />

programs <strong>and</strong> have driven much of the <strong>PLA</strong>’s<br />

regional military diplomacy.<br />

Wh<strong>at</strong> China confronts is a classic “security dilemma”<br />

where wh<strong>at</strong> Beijing views as security policies <strong>and</strong><br />

military moderniz<strong>at</strong>ion programs designed to equip<br />

<strong>and</strong> train the <strong>PLA</strong> to perform defensive missions are<br />

viewed by other governments as potentially if not<br />

probably offensive in their purpose. Beijing is fully<br />

aware of this dilemma <strong>and</strong> has been for a number of<br />

years as its constant b<strong>at</strong>tle against the “China thre<strong>at</strong>”<br />

thesis demonstr<strong>at</strong>es. Most recently, for example, in an<br />

assessment of Japan’s 2009 Defense White Paper, a <strong>PLA</strong><br />

64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!