epigrammatum anthologia palatina. - Notes du mont Royal

•334 ANTHOLOGLE PALATINJEUeposnisse lyram :saxosonuseju> inheiil.Seepe illuc solita est ascendcre lllia Nisi.Et pctcrc exiguo resonautia saia lapillo.-2. « N i o a i a, ittiveiov Meyaoiio;, xai autf, f, Msyapi; ,teph. Byz. Etiam Megara ipsa [Nisi regis urbsj, Ptolem.I, 15. » Jac. Dei. p. 334. — 3. De Alcathoo Theognist.773:o:6e ivxt, auro; pev JrtvpYioaa; noi.iv ax/Ty,AXza56ep neXoRo; itaiot xapi(6|Mvo;.'EiteopaSiv r|?e 8op.. Ductus color ex Apoll. Rh. I, 737scqq. — 4. Auxupehv', Delplticam, a Auxtapei; autiquu nomineDelphicorum." •Ev6eu.evo;. Sclutferus corrigebat 4v-8eu.evo;, quod verum videtur. Vid. Boiss. ad Philostr.Her. p. 542, qul etiam do ulriusquc verbi permutalionemonuit ad Marin. Vit. Procli p. 82. » Juc. — 6. TouXOIMIOV, ejus rei de qua xou.ndr.M. Pausanias I. c. • ?,v TV/.IJfjxiwv rt; tpvpstBi, xata Tajra oiro; fixriae *•' xi8xc,x xpovo8etaa.CCLXXX. — 2. Oavpa x. eaa , i. c. Oavp.aaiov eaouevovxal roi; vatepovCCLXXXI. Hpaivero;, Bithyniae oppidum.— •• 2. Xdipo;irtoxpioio;, locus in quo lit CM-rctio. Qua) cnrpus tan •quam superfliia ejicit, ri aitoxpc.oueva vocanlur et ittoyiopovvTa.Vid. Toup. adLongiu. Ilepi uij;. p. 375 et Foes.in (Econ. Hippocr. v. iitoxptae;. » Jac. — 4. Ilpopepet,supcral. Vidcad IX, ep. 344,4. Deindc 'AXetivopo; aliquntcdd. posl Aldum, incplc. 'AXe^xvopo; in hac sede vcrsumperturbat; itaquc Brunck. scriptum fuissc putabat : 4/X.itpoxeoer Nixaew lepev; Kai yip 'AXeTxvSpo;, aopir,; XTX.,recle, ut videtur cx epigr. 386, 2,uhi xxi yio sir. posilum.Meinokius ad Tlieocrit. p. 284 'AXeEapevo; lcgit.CCLXXXII. " Ducangiusin Cpoli Christ. 1. II, p. 175,hoc carmen conscriptum cxistimat in Vicloriarum statuas, quae in Niv.xi;, Constanlinopoli, collocatai lucrint.Merito dubites an v. eypx^ev v. 3 hanc interpretationcmadmittat. » Juc. I'r;cterea Constaiitinopolitanarum rerumtn Palladu; carmiuibus indicia certa video nulla. . Hccker. p. 119:» egrcgic » adscripsit Piccolos. Mutationis causa apparet.jfiscliyli 7to6u5ze; 6ppa (Sept. v. 605) scite comparat Jacobs.et ad aopi yeip. 6. affcrt Lucian. De salt. 69 : Aea6u>va(6 MvTt)r,vato; x el P oao ? ou 4 rciUC . 6pxr,aTa; inexiXei. —4 xaeaaova cod. Pal., undc Movasw Itrunck.; xpefaaovaPlan.CCLXXXIV. Sinum Lcostkenhim in Bosporo recentioresvorant Soslhenium , errantcs secundum P. Gylliutn'De Bosporo Thracio I. II, r. 14 (Geogrr. minor. C. Miillerit. II,p. 49); qui hoc lemma dat : A. £y-" cEty - opy.rjaTpiSo;larapevri; Iv TM -• — Helladie loiiuitur In candem scriptaep. 286 et 287. — 2. De choreis qua) in linperalo-rura honoremagebantur vid. Keiakius ad Constant. »biguum, apqgr, Par. et sileutium Salmasii testantur.CCLXXXIX. — In ipsum potius Xenopliuntcu pnnl»-lnimutn srriptum esse, quam iu statuam ejus, recte oiscrvatJacobs. — l Xrivot; edehatur; hoc vcro, nolaute J.icobsio,Baccbarum Euripidig argumento, quod rcprarson^,tabat Xcnoplion, minimc congruit : scd congruit Av)vxi;,llucchabus (conl. IX, ep. 248, 2). Corrcctionem rerepilDoiss. —2.« Scner Tiresias videtur intelligendus. » Jar.— 4. Nuntius a Citlucronc rcversus, ubi Baccharuintlnasos observaverat. — 6. « Tcuenduin Xenophoiilembas nmncs partes unum cxsccutum esse : in eo eniinsuinma artis ponebatur, si unus plures personas rertesustinerc posset. » Jac.CCXC. Lemma Plan. addidit Boiss.; at hoc quoqueepigr. non in statuam, sed in ipsum pantomimum illustrcmscriptum videtur, ut Boethi IX, ep. 248. — I. •• Afj-TOVjtotum se insinuavit in Racrhum. ita ut ipsum drumvideatur indnissc. — 2. TtxXriv rtp. 8vu, i e. Honiani, ulnartem exerrebat illc. Sucton. Aug. 45. » Jac. Del. p. 117.— 3. ivBpiinoi; TEpnvov 6ea;, qui spectantes jucundo terrorepercellerel. Ola pro 6TI Tota. « Scliol. W. : OtroxptvogcvovY a P TX Bix/ov ol OexTxi iSeiiiwv, ipwvTt; \xoi.ipevov*JvOviiouptvoi 6s Oiroxp-.Tfiv tivai, xal ov TOV 6eo-