03.06.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

on the border of the Judean Desert. His language is harsh, and<br />

he frequently threatens them with punishment if they fail to<br />

carry out his orders (“and if you will not do this, you will be<br />

punished”). <strong>In</strong> a Hebrew letter to Jonathan and Masbelah of<br />

En-Gedi, Bar Kokhba orders them to attend to the loading of<br />

a boat anchored in the harbor there. To the commanders in<br />

the rear and the population of the inhabited area of the desert,<br />

with whom he was incensed for having failed to supply<br />

food as he had commanded and who had neglected their duty,<br />

Bar Kokhba uses stern language: “You are living well, eating<br />

and drinking off the property of the house of Israel, and care<br />

nothing about your brethren.”<br />

<strong>In</strong> an Aramaic letter to Judah b. Manasseh of Kiryat Araviyah,<br />

Bar Kokhba orders Judah to supply him with the *Four<br />

Species for Tabernacles and apparently reminds him about<br />

separating the tithe: ןהתי ןקתו (“and give the dues from them”).<br />

Such references, made incidentally or hinted at in the letters,<br />

may indicate that Bar Kokhba’s men, even under danger,<br />

strictly and quite naturally kept the commandments of Judaism,<br />

such as the sanctity of the Sabbath, the laws of the priestly<br />

and levitical dues, and the fullest observance of festivals.<br />

The letters and other documents uncovered in the Judean<br />

Desert contain nothing specific about the attitude of the sages<br />

toward the rule of Bar Kokhba nor is there any mention in<br />

them of Bethar and of the war there. Nevertheless it is possible<br />

to comprehend from them explicitly and at first hand<br />

about Bar Kokhba’s aggressive personality and his status, the<br />

economic straits in which the fighters of Judea found themselves,<br />

and the geographic extent of the revolt. The nasi was<br />

concerned about supply problems, food for his camp, and matters<br />

pertaining to real estate. The economic documents found<br />

in Wadi Muraba’at show that leases were made in the name<br />

and with the sanction of Bar Kokhba: “On the instructions of<br />

Simeon b. Koseva.” Apparently the land belonged nominally<br />

to the nasi, it being clearly stated in a lease, “You have leased<br />

the ground from Simeon, the Nasi of Israel.” <strong>In</strong> his name the<br />

lessors laid down the quota of grain that was to be given to<br />

them. As was to be expected in a time of war, the authorities<br />

insisted on the cultivation of the fields and confiscated the<br />

lands of those who neglected to till them. They “were dispossessed<br />

of the land and lost everything.” <strong>In</strong> effect, Bar Kokhba<br />

regarded himself as holding the authority of the Roman emperor<br />

and transferred the lands of liberated Judea to his own<br />

possession. His orders concerning leases, sales, and confiscations<br />

were grounded on a juridical succession to the Roman<br />

rule, by virtue of which he was empowered to exercise control<br />

over the lands of Judea and confiscate property for the public<br />

good. Contracts found in Naḥal Ḥever indicate that Bar<br />

Kokhba wished to prevent the concentration of the lands of<br />

En-Gedi in the hands of a few owners in order to increase the<br />

supply of food in a time of stress.<br />

From the names of the settlements mentioned in these<br />

documents, Bar Kokhba’s men apparently controlled extensive<br />

areas, in the frontier regions of the Judean mountains, in the<br />

neighborhood of Bet Guvrin (Ir-Nahash), and in the Judean<br />

bar kokhba<br />

Desert, and maintained contact, it seems, with regions east<br />

and south of the Dead Sea, such as Ma’aleh ha-Luḥit in the<br />

district of Eglatin in Moab and Zoar in the Aravah. Herodium,<br />

the town of Herod about 6 mi. (10 km.) southeast of Jerusalem<br />

and mentioned in the documents, became an economic center<br />

in which the nasi’s representatives were stationed; En-Gedi<br />

was an important supply harbor for the rebels. The settlements<br />

of Tekoa and Kiryat Araviyah in the vicinity of Bethlehem are<br />

mentioned in the documents. According to the reconstruction<br />

of םילש… ב as Jerusalem, proposed by J.T. Milik who made a<br />

study of the Wadi Muraba’at documents, that city is referred<br />

to in two of them, one dating from the second, and the other<br />

from the fourth year “of the liberation of Israel” (Elul, 133 and<br />

Tishrei, 134, respectively). After the defeat, the fugitives from<br />

the war in Judea gathered in the Judean Desert, which then became<br />

the rebel center. The remains of Roman military camps<br />

found above the caves in Naḥal Ḥever show that the legions<br />

besieged the remnants of the fighters who, together with their<br />

families, had taken refuge in these hiding places. Surrounded<br />

by the Romans, there they met their death.<br />

[Samuel Abramsky]<br />

New Archaeological Finds<br />

Since the writing of the above in the late 1960s new archaeological<br />

information concerning the Bar Kokhba revolt has<br />

emerged as a result of the intensive investigation of hundreds<br />

of refuge caves and underground hiding complexes. Refuge<br />

caves are found mainly in the Judean Desert and in the cliffs<br />

overlooking the Dead Sea, and were used as shelters for Jewish<br />

refugees at the close of the Bar Kokhba revolt. Underground<br />

hiding complexes, however, were subterranean warrens hewn<br />

artificially under or near residential buildings within Jewish<br />

towns and villages (some 125 sites according to a recent<br />

count). They have been found in the Judean Shephela, and in<br />

the Beth-El and Hebron Mountains, and reflect the general<br />

boundaries of the area that was under Bar Kokhba’s administration.<br />

Excavations at the Abi’or Cave in the Judean Desert<br />

in 1986 and later in 1993 brought to light numerous fragments<br />

of new documents written on papyri in Greek and Aramaic.<br />

Additional finds from the cave consisted of textiles, ropes, and<br />

parts of sandals. These items were brought to the cave and hidden<br />

there towards the end of the revolt.<br />

Excavations conducted in 1984 by Tel Aviv University<br />

confirmed that Khirbet al-Yahud (10 acres in size) is indeed<br />

*Bethar, the last bastion of Bar Kokhba. Hastily erected fortifications<br />

were uncovered and the discovery of slingstones and<br />

arrowheads indicates that a battle took place there. Roman<br />

siege camps were also identified in the vicinity of Bethar (present-day<br />

Battir).<br />

Various artifacts dating from the time of the revolt have<br />

been unearthed at a number of sites and within underground<br />

hiding complexes, notably various forms of pottery, stone<br />

vessels, and coins. An important discovery was that of a lead<br />

weight found at Horvat ‘Alim in the Shephela, bearing the<br />

name and title of Bar Kokhba, which was evidently used for<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 3 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!