03.06.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

formal organizations rarely contacted their counterparts in<br />

the other community for cooperative action.<br />

Too poor, too overwhelmed with their own needs, black<br />

and Jewish agencies were small and limited in resources.<br />

Blacks and Jews stayed apart as well because of black antisemitism<br />

and Jewish racism. These attitudes were less potent<br />

there than they were among white Christians but they had<br />

an impact nonetheless. And there was one more concern, at<br />

least from the Jewish side. Jewish organizations struggling for<br />

acceptance recognized that racism was the stronger force and<br />

feared that any association with such a pariah group as blacks<br />

would hurt their own efforts. When Jewish Leo *Frank was<br />

convicted of murder in 1913 on the testimony of a black man<br />

in an antisemitic trial in Atlanta, and lynched two years later,<br />

it prompted the newly formed Anti-Defamation League (ADL)<br />

to proclaim its commitment to defending the rights of all. But<br />

in practice, Frank’s murder convinced many Jews that life in<br />

the United States was dangerous enough without taking on<br />

black people’s problems as well.<br />

While relatively few blacks and Jews interacted politically<br />

(outside of the Left), far more encountered each other<br />

in economic venues. <strong>In</strong> virtually every case, Jews had the upper<br />

hand. Because Jews were white, they were able to benefit<br />

from the American system that apportioned opportunity<br />

more by race than by ethnicity or religion. Their white skin<br />

and the urban skills they had brought from Europe enabled<br />

Jews to succeed more quickly than African Americans; it was<br />

the exodus of better-off Jews into better neighborhoods that<br />

brought black tenants to Jewish areas in the first place. These<br />

Jews, and those that remained, continued to run their original<br />

businesses; Jews owned up to 90% of the stores in many black<br />

neighborhoods. So the inevitable tensions in poor neighborhoods<br />

between landlords and tenants, shopkeepers and customers,<br />

social workers and clients came to be seen as black-<br />

Jewish conflicts, and they reinforced stereotypes of greedy<br />

and unscrupulous Jews, or lazy or irresponsible blacks.<br />

Another point of contact between the two communities<br />

was the arts, especially music and the new medium of motion<br />

pictures. Meeting first in vaudeville and other performance<br />

areas, Jews also rose to positions of greater power and became<br />

impresarios and agents for black performers. The same was<br />

also true in sports.<br />

Given the limited and hierarchical nature of relations between<br />

African Americans and American Jews, and although<br />

members of each community recognized the plight of the<br />

other, and were sensitive to prejudice, there was little positive<br />

mutual interaction in the first third of the 20th century.<br />

This changed with the rise of Nazism. With Jews threatened<br />

in Europe, and with the rise of fascist and antisemitic groups<br />

in the United States, it became clear to Jewish organizations<br />

that they desperately needed allies. And for black people,<br />

who recognized bigotry when they saw it, anti-Nazi efforts<br />

also offered the strongest challenge to American racism. The<br />

black press and several black groups therefore launched what<br />

Black-Jewish Relations in the united states<br />

they called a Double V campaign: victory against Nazism<br />

abroad and racism at home. Outspoken in their protest of Nazi<br />

atrocities, black groups also lost no opportunity to draw parallels<br />

with lynching and racial bigotry in the United States.<br />

Black-Jewish cooperation in the 1930s was clearly based<br />

on mutual self-interest, but one that recognized the shared<br />

danger inherent in any form of bigotry. These groups had<br />

come to recognize what the Left had been saying all along: that<br />

unity among the oppressed was the most effective weapon to<br />

bring about change. The Ribbentrop-Molotov, German-Soviet<br />

pact, however, discredited the Left in the eyes of many liberals,<br />

and the emerging Cold War made suspect all programs<br />

espoused by Communists. Stalin’s purges alienated still more<br />

Jews, who abandoned the Communist Party for liberal and<br />

progressive Jewish political organizations. Thus, Nazism and<br />

the war brought black and Jewish liberals to a new recognition<br />

of the importance of civil rights and racial tolerance. At<br />

the same time, anti-Communism also led them to limit their<br />

strategies, goals, and coalitions in ways that hobbled the potential<br />

for fundamental social change. The stage was set for<br />

what many consider the “golden age” of black-Jewish relations.<br />

Political relations between black and Jewish political<br />

agencies warmed further as the modern civil rights movement<br />

gained real force. The two communities had gotten to know<br />

one another through common work. Their organizations<br />

had become more desirable allies as their earlier successes<br />

brought increased membership, stronger finances, and greater<br />

political access. And they shared a set of liberal values, including<br />

bringing change within the existing system; employing<br />

moderate, non-confrontational tactics in doing so; a commitment<br />

to the centrality of individual rights rather than privileges<br />

bestowed by membership in a group; and a conviction<br />

that it was the obligation of government to foster equal opportunity.<br />

They advocated litigation, education, and legislation<br />

to bring about equality, evidenced, for example, in the<br />

American Jewish Congress’s new Commission on Law and<br />

Social Action.<br />

By the late 1940s, liberal civil rights organizations rooted<br />

in the two communities slowly began to develop a close partnership,<br />

launching programs separately and jointly to improve<br />

conditions for racial and religious minorities. This can still be<br />

viewed as self-interest, but it was now a broader concept. The<br />

NAACP, with the help of all the main Jewish organizations,<br />

won a Supreme Court case declaring restrictive housing covenants<br />

unenforceable, which benefited both groups but particularly<br />

economically mobile Jews. The NAACP came to the<br />

Brown v. Board of Education case, as well as its predecessors,<br />

armed with amicus briefs from virtually every other black<br />

and Jewish civil rights organization (along with other progressive,<br />

union, religious, and civic groups). The creation of New<br />

York’s state college system was a joint black-Jewish effort to<br />

combat religious and racial discrimination in higher education.<br />

Together they fought to make permanent the war’s Fair<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 3 735

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!