03.06.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eghi<br />

crease in the numbers of poor and those reduced to begging,<br />

nothing is heard about Jewish mendicants forming a society<br />

and developing their own subculture, as did occur within the<br />

non-Jewish world at that time.<br />

Jewish beggars wandering from place to place are more<br />

frequently found throughout the Middle Ages. <strong>In</strong> the Cairo<br />

Genizah a large number of letters from beggars complaining<br />

of their misfortunes and seeking support have been found.<br />

The documents indicate that these itinerant poor wandered<br />

from community to community, and from land to land. The<br />

Or Zaru’a (hilkhot Ẓedakah 11) of R. *Isaac of Vienna mentions<br />

that these destitute people customarily equipped themselves<br />

with “documents,” i.e., letters of recommendation which<br />

they would present in their travels as proof of their trustworthiness.<br />

<strong>In</strong> medieval times there was another class of wanderers<br />

who went from place to place, relying upon the hospitality of<br />

others, namely, the yeshivah students who moved from one<br />

center of <strong>Torah</strong> study to another. A parallel phenomenon (goliards,<br />

vagrant scholars) is found within the student community<br />

of Christian society of that time.<br />

At the end of the 17th century, a relatively large class of<br />

Jewish beggars, called in non-Jewish sources “Betteljuden,”<br />

and orḥei porḥei (“flotsam and jetsam”) in Jewish literature,<br />

developed throughout Europe, especially in Germany. The size<br />

of this class is not known exactly, but it has been estimated<br />

at as much as 20% of the total Jewish population. Although<br />

the reasons for the formation of this class are still not completely<br />

clear, it is assumed to have resulted from (i) the natural<br />

growth of the Jewish population; (ii) the limited number of<br />

Jews permitted to reside in any individual place by the local<br />

authorities; and (iii) the unstable economic conditions which<br />

brought about drastic changes from extreme wealth to great<br />

poverty. The Betteljuden constituted a section within the large<br />

class of non-Jewish itinerant poor. These Jewish vagabonds,<br />

like their Christian counterparts, eventually united into societies,<br />

religiously intermixed at times, developing their own<br />

subculture. This class became a source of manpower and information<br />

to the bands of thieves which were rampant at that<br />

time. The authorities treated these groups of Jewish mendicants<br />

very harshly. They condemned them for thievery and<br />

for causing diseases and plagues in various places. As a result<br />

of these accusations, local authorities sought to banish<br />

the beggars. The Jewish communities were very ambivalent<br />

vis-à-vis these mendicants. On the one hand, they strove to<br />

obey the local powers-that-be, for they also saw in the beggars<br />

a social danger, not only because of their associations with<br />

thieves, but also because of their licentiousness. Yet, on the<br />

other hand, they not infrequently had feelings of compassion<br />

and brotherliness toward these unfortunates. The manner in<br />

which the communities handled these orḥei porḥei, therefore,<br />

corresponded to their ambivalence toward them. <strong>In</strong> general,<br />

the community accommodated them in the homes of its residents<br />

for one night (for two nights over the Sabbath), and<br />

afterward sent them along with a sum of money for travel<br />

expenditures. Special lodgings for mendicants, particularly<br />

for the sick among them, were also set up in the hekdesh (“poor<br />

house”). After the Emancipation, with residence restrictions<br />

for Jews lifted, and areas in which Jews were permitted to<br />

work widened, this impoverished class was largely integrated<br />

with other social classes. However, the phenomenon itself did<br />

not disappear from Jewish communal life, and it continued<br />

to exist especially in Eastern Europe, if not to the same extent.<br />

Bibliography: I. Abrahams, Jewish Life in the Middle Ages<br />

(19322), 331ff., 346f.; Baron, Community, 1 (1942), 131f., 363; 2 (1942),<br />

321–5; Urbach, in: Zion, 16, nos. 3–4 (1951), 1–27; R. Glanz, Geschichte<br />

des niederen juedischen Volks in Deutschland (1968); Scheiber, in:<br />

M. Zohary and A. Tartakower (eds.), Hagut Ivrit be-Eiropah (1969),<br />

268–75.<br />

BEGHI, family of Karaite scholars in Constantinople (15th–17th<br />

centuries). Its members include: ELIJAH AFIDAH (AFDAH)<br />

BEGHI (d. before 1641). Elijah wrote Hilkhot Sheḥitah, on the<br />

rules of slaughtering; Be’ur Asarah Ikkarim, on the ten principles<br />

of Karaite faith; Mikhtav Eliyahu, poems, verse compositions<br />

and tales; several responsa (all these works survived<br />

in manuscripts kept in various libraries). JOSEPH BEN<br />

MOSES (15th–16th centuries). Joseph was the pupil of the Karaite<br />

scholar Abraham *Bali, who in 1505 wrote for Beghi and<br />

his fellow student, Joseph b. Caleb, his Issur Hadlakat Ner be-<br />

Shabbat, on the Karaite prohibition of kindling lights on the<br />

Sabbath. The cordial relationship between the Karaites and<br />

*Rabbanites at that period is attested by Joseph’s correspondence<br />

with Rabbanite scholars. Two letters by Moses b. Jacob<br />

(evidently *Moses of Kiev “ha-Goleh”) to Beghi are preserved.<br />

Joseph wrote Iggeret Sukkah, on Sukkot; Keter Kehunnah, six<br />

homilies; Iggeret Kiryah Ne’emanah especially directed against<br />

the identification of the Karaites with the Sadducees, a work<br />

of literary and historical value since it mentions a number of<br />

earlier Karaite scholars; Iggeret Kelulah, an explanation of a<br />

problem in marriage law. Simḥah Isaac b. Moses Lutzki mentions<br />

two important works of Joseph which are no longer<br />

traceable: Shulḥan Ḥaverim, a book of precepts, and Safah<br />

Berurah, a philosophical work. MOSES BEN BENJAMIN (second<br />

half of the 16th century), wrote Mitzvot Moshe, a book of<br />

precepts including two essays “Ohel Moshe” on the calendar,<br />

and “Masat Moshe” on the Sabbath laws, published in Pinnat<br />

Yikrat by the Karaite *Isaac b. Solomon (1834; non-critical<br />

print, 2 vols., Ashdod 2005). Benjamin also composed liturgical<br />

poems, several of which have been included in the<br />

Karaite prayer book.<br />

Bibliography: A. Neubauer, Aus der Petersburger Bibliothek<br />

(1866), 46n, 122; Danon, in: JQR 15 (1924/25), 337–39; HB, 17 (1877), 12;<br />

Mann, Texts, 2 (1935), 294n, 300, 302; Simḥah Isaac b. Moses (Lutzki),<br />

Oraḥ Ẓaddikim (1966), 98, 99, 107, 109; Z. Ankori, Karaites in Byzantium<br />

(1959), 36n, 58, 279. add. bibliography: M.L. Wilensky, in:<br />

PAAJR 40 (1972) 109–146; M. Polliack (ed.), Karaite Judaism: A Guide<br />

to Its History and Literary Sources, (2003), index.<br />

[Isaak Dov Ber Markon]<br />

260 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!