03.06.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Bitburg controversy<br />

On April 11, the White House announced that the Bitburg<br />

cemetery was on Reagan’s itinerary, and that Reagan<br />

and Kohl would lay a wreath there “in a spirit of reconciliation,<br />

in a spirit of forty years of peace, in a spirit of economic<br />

and military compatibility.” Kenneth J. Bialkin, chairman<br />

of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations,<br />

called Reagan’s decision to visit Bitburg but not Dachau<br />

“deeply offensive,” and noted author and Holocaust survivor<br />

Elie *Wiesel, then chairman of the United States Holocaust<br />

Memorial Council, told The New York Times that he could<br />

not believe that the president “would visit a German military<br />

cemetery and refuse to visit Dachau or any other concentration<br />

camp.”<br />

At a press conference on April 18, Reagan made matters<br />

worse by appearing to equate dead German soldiers with<br />

the victims of the Holocaust. “They were victims,” he said of<br />

the soldiers buried at Bitburg, “just as surely as the victims<br />

in the concentration camps.” Reagan’s comments drew angry<br />

responses from American Jewish leaders. Rabbi Alexander<br />

Schindler, president of the Union of American Hebrew<br />

Congregations, described Reagan’s remarks as a “distortion<br />

of history, a perversion of language, and a callous offense to<br />

the Jewish community.”<br />

A long-scheduled ceremony in the White House on<br />

April 19, awarding, the Congressional Medal of Achievement,<br />

provided the charismatic Wiesel with an unprecedented opportunity<br />

to publicly confront the White House on national<br />

television. Despite fierce pressure to mute the confrontation<br />

with Reagan, whose strong support of Israel was valued, Wiesel<br />

implored him not to go to Bitburg. “That place,” he told<br />

the president during a nationally televised White House ceremony,<br />

“is not your place. Your place is with the victims of<br />

the SS.” Other Jewish leaders similarly called on Reagan to reconsider,<br />

as did 53 U.S. senators on April 15, and 101 members<br />

of the U.S. House of Representatives on April 19 in bipartisan<br />

letters to the president.<br />

Immediately after the public castigation by Elie Wiesel,<br />

the White House announced that Bergen-Belsen had been<br />

added to the president’s German itinerary. Two days later,<br />

Menachem Rosensaft, addressing thousands of Holocaust survivors<br />

gathered in Philadelphia, called on survivors, children<br />

of survivors, and American war veterans to confront Reagan<br />

at the gates of Bergen-Belsen. If the president insisted “on going<br />

to Bitburg,” Rosensaft said, “we do not need him and we<br />

do not want him in Bergen-Belsen.”<br />

Former President Richard M. Nixon, former Secretary<br />

of State Henry Kissinger, and conservative columnist William<br />

F. Buckley, among others, endorsed the Bitburg visit, and<br />

several public opinion polls indicated that only about 52 percent<br />

of Americans were opposed to it. West German officials,<br />

meanwhile, pressured the Reagan Administration to stand<br />

fast. On April 19, Alfred Dregger, the chairman of Kohl’s<br />

parliamentary group, wrote to U.S. senators who had urged<br />

Reagan to change his itinerary that his only brother had died<br />

on the Eastern Front in 1944, and that “If you call upon your<br />

President to refrain from the noble gesture he plans to make<br />

at the military cemetery in Bitburg, I must consider this to<br />

be an insult to my brother and my comrades who were killed<br />

in action.”<br />

Reagan’s insistence on going through with the Bitburg<br />

visit, and his attempt to combine back-to-back tributes to<br />

the Jewish victims of the Holocaust at Bergen-Belsen and<br />

to German soldiers at Bitburg, served primarily to offend the<br />

Jewish community in general and Holocaust survivors and<br />

their families in particular. “President Reagan and Chancellor<br />

Kohl have embarked on a macabre tour, an obscene package<br />

deal, of Bergen-Belsen and Bitburg,” declared Menachem<br />

Rosensaft at a protest demonstration at Bergen-Belsen on<br />

May 5, minutes after the two leaders had left for Bitburg. “Today<br />

we say to them that they can either honor the memory<br />

of the victims of Belsen, or they can honor the SS. They cannot<br />

do both. And by entering Bitburg, they desecrate the<br />

memory of all those who were murdered by the SS, and of<br />

all those whom they pretended to commemorate here at<br />

Belsen.”<br />

<strong>In</strong> a short speech at the U.S. Air Force base at Bitburg<br />

on May 5, Reagan said: “Our duty today is to mourn the human<br />

wreckage of totalitarianism, and today, in Bitburg Cemetery,<br />

we commemorated the potential good and humanity<br />

that was consumed back then, 40 years ago.” President Reagan<br />

and West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl spoke about<br />

the importance of Holocaust remembrance beside the massgraves<br />

of the Nazi concentration camp of Bergen-Belsen, and<br />

then proceeded to the Bitburg military cemetery where they<br />

participated in a wreath-laying in memory of German soldiers<br />

killed during World War II. The visit to Bergen-Belsen<br />

was widely seen as a desperate attempt by the White House<br />

staff to deflect the controversy over Reagan’s agreement to<br />

join Kohl at Bitburg during the president’s long-planned state<br />

visit to Germany.<br />

<strong>In</strong> fact, however, as a New York Times editorial observed<br />

on May 6, Reagan’s decision to go through with the<br />

Bitburg visit was a “blunder,” one of the few times that he lost<br />

a confrontation in the court of public opinion. Known as the<br />

great communicator, Reagan found that Wiesel and others<br />

could get their message across to the mass media and the normally<br />

sure-footed White House was reeling. From the perspective<br />

of two decades, the German chancellor attempt to rehabilitate<br />

the reputation of the Waffen-SS has also failed. New<br />

research and public exhibitions in German museums further<br />

link them to the crimes of the Holocaust. It was, however,<br />

regarded by many observers as one of American Jewry’s finest<br />

moment, when in the words of Wiesel, “truth was spoken<br />

to power.”<br />

Bibliography: I. Levkov (ed.), Bitburg and Beyond: Encounters<br />

in American, German and Jewish (1986); D.E. Lipstadt, “The Bitburg<br />

Controversy,” in: American Jewish Year Book, 1987; E. Wiesel, And<br />

the Sea is Never Full (1999), 225–50; C.E. Silberman, A Certain People:<br />

American Jews and Their Lives Today (1985), 360–66.<br />

[Michael Berenbaum (2nd ed.)<br />

728 ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!