03.06.2013 Views

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

JUDAICA - Wisdom In Torah

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

showdown between them at Megiddo in the mid-15th century<br />

B.C.E. is recorded in the Annals of Thutmose III (Aharoni,<br />

1979, 153–54); the earliest and most detailed record to date of<br />

a military campaign.<br />

After his victory at Megiddo, Thutmose III makes a follow-up<br />

campaign in which he claims to have subjugated 119<br />

cities. The topographic list is inscribed on the walls of the<br />

temple of Amen-Re at Karnak (Aharoni, 1979: 154–65). It is<br />

here that Beth-Shean is mentioned for the first time as bt š’ir<br />

(No. 110). It is probably after this that Thutmose III built the<br />

garrison of Level IXB (ca. 1450–1375 B.C.E.). Dating to a time<br />

slightly after this, when the settlement goes through renovations<br />

in Level IXA, Beth-Shean is mentioned a second time in<br />

Amarna Letter 289:20 (ANET 489) as bit ša-a-ni. The town is<br />

described as an Egyptian garrison staffed by Canaanite mercenaries<br />

loyal to Tagi the son-(father?)-in-law of Lab’ayu (see<br />

other references to these individuals in EA 252–54; 264–66).<br />

Additional testimony to these rulers came to light in 1993<br />

when excavators of Roman-Byzantine Scythopolis found a<br />

small clay cylinder bearing the names Tagi and Lab’ayu in the<br />

spoil heaps of the University of Pennsylvania excavations at<br />

the foot of the mound.<br />

Even though the settlement of Level IX in both of its<br />

phases was an Egyptian garrison as indicated in the textual<br />

references and from the various finds of Egyptian inspiration,<br />

the town nevertheless remained largely Canaanite in character.<br />

All the buildings, the temple complex, and most of the artifacts<br />

were typical of northern Palestine. The well-known basalt slab<br />

depicting a lion and dog (lioness?) in combat is regarded by<br />

most as a prime example of Late Bronze Age Canaanite art.<br />

Levels VIII–VII (c. 1300–1200 B.C.E., Late Bronze Age IIB). At<br />

some point towards the end of the 18th Dynasty, the settlement<br />

of Level IX was destroyed and rebuilt on a new plan<br />

(Level VIII). This change reflects an intensification of Egyptian<br />

control, perhaps beginning with Seti I, ca. 1300 B.C.E.<br />

The explanation for this may lie in the growing Hittite threat<br />

to the north. To counter this, Egypt not only strengthened its<br />

hold on the Beth-Shean garrison, but increased the number of<br />

Egyptian outposts and exercised its influence in other ways as<br />

well. Level VII probably represents renovations to the original<br />

Level VIII settlement in the time of Ramesses II.<br />

As noted above, the Ramesside period settlement was<br />

built on an entirely new plan with only the temple in the same<br />

location as the earlier sanctuary of Level IX. Residential units<br />

organized into city blocks with an orthogonal street configuration<br />

stood east of the temple. To the west of the temple<br />

were two large Egyptian-style structures that probably served<br />

the interests of the garrison – the so-called “Migdol” (fortified<br />

building) and the “Commandant’s House.” The first was<br />

probably an administrative building and the second a Three<br />

Room House. A third building revealed by Mazar further to<br />

the north below Building 1500 of Lower VI resembles in part<br />

the square fortress at Deir el-Balah from the same period.<br />

bet-shean<br />

This building may have been the residence of a high official.<br />

<strong>In</strong> contrast to the garrison of Level IX where Egyptian-style<br />

pottery comprised only 1% of the assemblage, the Ramesside<br />

era settlement produced around 25 times that amount.<br />

During this time, Beth-Shean appears in the topographic<br />

lists of Seti I and Ramesses II (Aharoni, 1979, 176–83), as<br />

well as in Papyrus Anastasi I from the end of the 13th century<br />

(ANET, 477). Three stelae were also found in later reuse by<br />

the University Museum. Two belong to the time of Seti I and<br />

the third to his son Ramesses II. The first stele of Seti dates<br />

to the first year of his reign and describes an extensive campaign<br />

that included the rescue of Beth-Shean and Rehov (Tell<br />

ec-Sârem) from Pella (Pexel) and Hammath (Tell el-Ammeh)<br />

(ANET, 253; Rowe, 1930, 24–29). The second stele mentions a<br />

skirmish involving the ʿApiru (ANET, 255; Rowe, 1930, 29–30).<br />

A third stele from the ninth year of Ramesses II mentions a<br />

campaign that probably passed by way of Beth-Shean (ANET,<br />

255; Rowe, 1930, 33–36). A small stone stele dedicated to “Mekal,<br />

the god, the lord of Beth-Shean” was mistakenly attributed<br />

to Level IX; it actually belongs to the 13th century (James and<br />

McGovern,1993, 240, Appendix, No. 8).<br />

Late VII–Lower VI (c. 1200–1125 B.C.E., Iron IA). The 20th<br />

Dynasty, the final stage of Egyptian control in Palestine, begins<br />

with an ephemeral phase called “Late VII” (12th century<br />

B.C.E.). The main stratum of this period is Level VI, which the<br />

University of Pennsylvania divided into “Lower VI” (12th century<br />

B.C.E.) and “Upper VI” (11th century B.C.E.). The Level VI<br />

temple was rebuilt on the same spot as the Level VII sanctuary,<br />

while the Migdol and the Commandant’s House were replaced<br />

by probable storehouses. The square administrative building of<br />

Level VII was replaced in Lower VI by Building 1500, the “Governor’s<br />

Residence,” a square building with a central hall surrounded<br />

by rooms. <strong>In</strong> Egypt, this type of structure is known<br />

as a “Center Hall House.” Architectural fragments from this<br />

and other buildings included lotus-shaped column capitals,<br />

inscribed doorjambs, a life-sized statue of a seated Ramesses<br />

III which was found in the following level, and inscriptions.<br />

The most important inscription was a carved limestone lintel<br />

depicting Ramesses-Weser-Khepesh, who is identified as<br />

“commander of the troops,” with cartouches of Ramesses III<br />

next to him. These finds, as well as a high percentage of locally<br />

produced Egyptian pottery, attest to an intensive Egyptian<br />

presence at this time.<br />

<strong>In</strong> the Hebrew Bible, Beth-Shean was assigned to the<br />

tribe of Manasseh, but they were unable to hold onto it because<br />

of the military superiority of the Canaanites (Josh. 17:11,<br />

16; Judg. 1:27). According to the conventional chronology,<br />

this period in biblical history would correspond to Lower VI<br />

when the Egyptians were in control of Beth-Shean. It is uncertain<br />

when the Egyptians finally abandoned the site, but<br />

many scholars suggest the second half of the 12th century in<br />

the time of Ramesses VI or Ramesses VIII. <strong>In</strong> the ashes of the<br />

destruction of Lower VI were found sherds of Mycenean IIIC<br />

ENCYCLOPAEDIA <strong>JUDAICA</strong>, Second Edition, Volume 3 543

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!