26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Abergele Business Park<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

17781 Miss Roxanne Rebecca Taylor [1560] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18280 Miss Dawn Alison Poole [1871] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19536 Mr Alastair Bainbridge [1960] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19355 Mr Peter W Osborn [1469] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site.<br />

19700 Mr Kenneth Williams [979] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18159 Mr Adam Judge [1720] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18335 Mrs Marjorie Short [1914] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18181 Mr James William Fall [1758] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18346 Mr Donald Short [1921] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

985

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!