26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Bodlondeb, Conwy<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

22348 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] 1 Object<br />

Summary Cultural Heritage - It is questioned whether the housing provision within the Essential Setting <strong>of</strong> the World Heritage <strong>Site</strong> <strong>and</strong> within the historic l<strong>and</strong>scape<br />

designation (to the north <strong>of</strong> the castle <strong>and</strong> town walls, south <strong>of</strong> Twthill Farm) sits comfortably within the Strategic Policies for the Cultural Heritage or with the<br />

WO Circulars 60/96 <strong>and</strong> 61/96 Planning <strong>and</strong> the Historic Environment: Archaeology <strong>and</strong> Historic Buildings <strong>and</strong> Conservation Areas. Other c<strong>and</strong>idate sites<br />

have been dismissed for these reasons.<br />

Change Sought: Review the allocation.<br />

13477 Katie Trent [3852] 1 Object<br />

Summary CR12<br />

This site was not on the 2009 LDP as residental allocation, why is it appearing now? It is a green field site next to the local nature reserve. It feels<br />

inappropriate for such a large development on the outskirts <strong>of</strong> a historic town.<br />

SR43<br />

Again another green field site.<br />

Change Sought: Removal <strong>of</strong> the site CR12 & SR43 from the development proposals.<br />

13494 Dr T A Rowell [3863] 12 Object<br />

Summary We are residents living in the Cadnant Park, Conwy <strong>and</strong> are extremely concerned about aspects <strong>of</strong> the Plan which we consider to be unsound.<br />

<strong>Site</strong> (CR12) is within, or close to several statutory/non-statutory designations:<br />

1. World Heritage <strong>Site</strong><br />

2. Essential Setting <strong>of</strong> the World Heritage <strong>Site</strong><br />

3. L<strong>and</strong>scape <strong>of</strong> Outst<strong>and</strong>ing Historic Interest<br />

4. National Park<br />

5. Local Nature Reserve<br />

6. Listed Buildings<br />

7. <strong>Site</strong> <strong>of</strong> Special Scientific Interest<br />

8. Biodiversity Areas<br />

9. Green Flag Award<br />

10. Outst<strong>and</strong>ing Quality L<strong>and</strong>scape Character (LANDMAP)<br />

The allocation <strong>of</strong> site (CR12) is contrary to national/local guidance <strong>and</strong> is inconsistent with the approach to site selection.<br />

Change Sought: Remove the housing allocation at Bodlondeb, Conwy.<br />

14432 Ms Sara Allardice [3901] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object as follows:<br />

The LDP does not have regard to:<br />

The World Heritage <strong>Site</strong> Management Plan<br />

The Urban Green Space Habitat Management Plan<br />

Planning Policy Wales<br />

Tourism Action Plan<br />

The plan includes a vision, objectives <strong>and</strong> policies that all aim to protect <strong>and</strong> promote historic assets, open green spaces, biodiversity <strong>and</strong> dtourism. The<br />

allocation <strong>of</strong> this site to housing <strong>and</strong> employmenet runs contrary to its own policies <strong>and</strong>, as such, the allocation does not flow logically from the strategy.<br />

The assessment <strong>and</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Site</strong> CR12 has not been properly executed <strong>and</strong> should therefore be removed from the LDP.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site<br />

14427 Mrs Elizabeth Mair Pattinson [1167] 1 Object<br />

Summary I object as follows:<br />

The council made a compulsory purchase <strong>of</strong> the estate to ensure its preservation as an open space for all times.<br />

The l<strong>and</strong>scape quality <strong>of</strong> the Bodlondeb <strong>and</strong> Benarth headl<strong>and</strong>s, the twin sentinels surrounding the World Hertiage <strong>Site</strong> <strong>and</strong> Conwy Castle <strong>and</strong> Walls have<br />

always been considered an asset to Conwy.<br />

The setting has always been <strong>of</strong> immense importance to the castle <strong>and</strong> the walls both <strong>of</strong> which are the jewel in the crown <strong>of</strong> the rich tapestry.<br />

It should be listed as a historical or heritage park.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

14070 MR FRANK YOUD [3896] 1 Object<br />

Summary I submit that, if this open space, valuable to maintaining a buffer between the Bodlondeb woods, <strong>and</strong> Bodlondeb itself, has any sort <strong>of</strong> houses <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>of</strong>fices<br />

built there, it will change the rural atmosphere <strong>of</strong> this delightful road <strong>and</strong> leafy environment for ever. This is not the type <strong>of</strong> development for Conwy, or<br />

Deganwy. For example, there is ample room on the old Hotpoint site in <strong>Ll<strong>and</strong>udno</strong> <strong>Junction</strong> for commercial developments. And as far as housing needs are<br />

concerned, the two new estates in <strong>Junction</strong> are excellent, especially the one on the brown site.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

13470 mrs jess smith [3842] 1 Object<br />

Summary The proposed housing would be on l<strong>and</strong> which is undeveloped (which contradicts the council's aim to use previously developed l<strong>and</strong>). In addition, the green<br />

fields backing onto bonlondeb woods are a wonderful green corridor into the historic town <strong>of</strong> conwy which would be ruined if made into another housing<br />

estate. The documents speak <strong>of</strong> protecting the unique natural environment <strong>and</strong> this site is just that, seen from the castle walls, this green space is an asset<br />

<strong>and</strong> should be protected <strong>and</strong> not destroyed.<br />

Change Sought: I would like a more suitable site for housing development to be found.<br />

14516 Conwy Civic Society (Dr Michael Senior) [4481] 1 Object<br />

Summary Whilst we have to take the pragmatic view that some development <strong>of</strong> Conwy's housing <strong>and</strong> commercial life is essential to the town's future, it is regrettable<br />

that this particular l<strong>and</strong> has been selected for such use. As a continuation from Bodlondeb park l<strong>and</strong>, it forms a good visual break between the Conwy Morfa<br />

built development <strong>and</strong> the town <strong>of</strong> Conwy itself on the western approach into town. However it is clear that should such allocation be a requirement under the<br />

LDP, there are serious limitations within the existing settlement boundary to find an alternative site.<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

555

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!