26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

Policy HOU/1 Meeting The Housing Needs, Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

1841 Mrs Caroline Evans [196] 1 Support<br />

Summary Restrict the development <strong>of</strong> new dwellings in the village to the infill sites already identified in the current plant (site 284) <strong>and</strong> to restrict that housing to<br />

affordable housing as required for local need.<br />

Change Sought: Restrict the development in the village to site 284 <strong>and</strong> to restrict that housing to affordable housing.<br />

1757 Watkin Jones Homes (Mr Goronwy Owen) [879] 1 Support<br />

Summary We support the inclusion <strong>of</strong> this l<strong>and</strong> as an allocated housing site within the plan.<br />

Change Sought: We propose the inclusion <strong>of</strong> the remainder <strong>of</strong> this field as an allocated housing site within the plan (full details previously provided).<br />

360 Betws yn Rhos Conservation Society (Mr John Wickins) [630] 1 Object<br />

Summary A further contradiction exists in Table 13, <strong>Site</strong> No. 284 Ffordd Llanelwy - shows an allocation <strong>of</strong> 5 houses in 2015-6. Yet Table 3.6 states there are no infra<br />

structure constraints. But in fact, sewerage, water <strong>and</strong> gas networks have been identified as constraints elsewhere. Table 3.6 also states there is access to a<br />

doctor's surgery in village which again contradicts Appendix 1 <strong>of</strong> BP8. DWR/Welsh Water's comments under apply to this site as well.<br />

The statement that the site capacity has been reduced is not a viable argument since another site in the village is being proposed for development.<br />

We reiterate the Society's request that no further housing developments be allowed in the village until all the infrastructure issues (sewerage, water <strong>and</strong> gas<br />

networks) be satisfactorily resolved<br />

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd Llanelwy from the LDP<br />

1229 Ms Beryl Fletcher [1466] 1 Object<br />

Summary Objection to site 284/91 Ffordd Llanelwy, Betws yn Rhos. See attachment.<br />

Change Sought: Remove site 284/91 from the Plan.<br />

1847 Cyngor Cymuned Betws yn Rhos Community Council (Mr Gwyndaf Morris) [2065] 1 Object<br />

Summary This is the fourth time the LDP has been altered <strong>and</strong> it must be lodged with the WAG.<br />

There are currently 10 unsold properties in the village.<br />

The sewerage system is at maximum capacity already.<br />

The school has no further capacity.<br />

The road structure <strong>and</strong> network is inadequate with issues with pavements.<br />

The bus <strong>and</strong> coach services are inadequate <strong>and</strong> do not have further capacity.<br />

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd Llanelwy from the LDP<br />

1834 Mr Gwyn Hughes [2056] 1 Object<br />

Summary The B5381 through Betws-yn-Rhos is only the width <strong>of</strong> a lorry near Cae Matw (road out <strong>of</strong> Betws Ffordd Llanelwy) the same at the bend around the cemetry<br />

(near the Wheatsheaf Inn) <strong>and</strong> again the road out <strong>of</strong> Betws towards Colwyn Bay by Airliewood/Bay Cottage.<br />

The capacity <strong>of</strong> the sewerage treatment plant is at its limit.<br />

Ten houses are already proposed or being built, there is no need for another ten houses.<br />

No footpath along Ffordd Llanelwy, very dangerous walking children to school.<br />

Change Sought: Remove Ffordd Llanelwy from the LDP<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!