Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES
4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Cwm Road, Penmaenmawr
Rep No Name People Type
20024 Mr & Mrs Griffiths [5154] 11 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
20022 Mr Mark Tharme [5153] 18 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22325 Mr Paul Woods [5158] 4 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22326 Mr Gethin Roberts [5159] 11 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22327 Bethan Edwards [5160] 17 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22328 Mr Peter McCarthy [5161] 3 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22329 Einir Rowlands [5162] 17 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22330 Gemma Roberts [5163] 1 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22331 D Evans [5164] 12 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22333 S Roberts [5166] 5 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
20028 Pat Williams [5155] 20 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22543 Penmaenmawr Town Council (A M Jones) [5192] 1 Object
Summary The proposal at Cwm Road is the one that has been least thought of as access here would be a problem in addition to the existing infrastructure within
Penmaenmawr not being able to cope with an increase in traffic.
Change Sought: Delete site.
22332 J Hughes [5165] 12 Object
Summary We object to the above proposal on the grounds that the development would have an unacceptable adverse impact: i) on residential amenity; ii) From traffic
generated; iii) On environment conditions arising from noise, lighting, vibration, odour, noxious emissions or dust; iv) on ecological and wildlife interests and
landscape character; v) On flooding and flood risk; vi) On quality of ground or surface water; vii) On essential community facilities.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
20015 Cllr. Ken Stevens [3800] 199 Object
Summary We are of the opinion that the above Greenfield site is unsuitable for development on the following ground; Policy DP/4, A. effecting existing residential
amenity, B. from traffic generated (approx 120 extra vehicles), and H, on the best and mose versatile agricultural land.
Change Sought: Replace site 26 with site 135.
561