26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, Abergele Business Park<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

18423 Mrs Rhiannon Lally [1387] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18269 Mr Leslie Samuel Evans [1861] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19545 Mrs Wendy Bainbridge [1971] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19606 Miss Pat Roberts [1832] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18104 Mr Brian C Roberts [1347] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18368 Mr Gordon Leech [1963] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19587 Ms Ann May Andrews [2504] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

18258 Mrs Joan Wayre [1818] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

19666 Mr Richard Thomas Byron Wade [1335] 1 Object<br />

Summary This site has planning permission for employment uses. One <strong>of</strong> the themes <strong>of</strong> the LDP is to create jobs. The removal <strong>of</strong> this previously developed l<strong>and</strong> site<br />

from employment uses is illogical <strong>and</strong> sequentially unsustainable.<br />

The plan fails to demonstrate why other sequentially preferable <strong>and</strong> previously developed employment sites in the County have not been reviewed for housing<br />

potential the effect <strong>of</strong> which would reduce the scale <strong>of</strong> new <strong>and</strong> windfall allocation for the town.<br />

There is no evidence that the Traffic Improvement Scheme can be delivered or can achieve its stated objective<br />

Change Sought: Deletion <strong>of</strong> site<br />

989

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!