26.03.2013 Views

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES<br />

4.3.4 New B1, B2&B8 Employment Development, Policy EMP/2 NEW B1, B2 AND B8 EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT, L<strong>and</strong> at Orme View Filling Station, Dwygy<br />

Rep No Name People Type<br />

19554 Mr Adrian Lloyd Jones [4569] 1 Object<br />

Summary The allocation <strong>of</strong> Employment L<strong>and</strong> is totally inappropriate for Dwygyfylchi, which, as a gateway village to the Snowdonia National Park, has tourism as its<br />

main function. Whilst creation <strong>of</strong> employment in Conwy Borough is necessary, Dwygyfylchi is not the appropriate location for such development. Industrial<br />

estates are currently being constructed at Mochdre <strong>and</strong> East <strong>of</strong> Colwyn Bay <strong>and</strong> both are under-used so there is simply no reason for another industrial site in<br />

Dwygyfylchi. Such a development could seriously harm existing tourist related businesses <strong>and</strong> could destroy future tourism opportunities.<br />

Change Sought: Small, appropriate development on the footprint <strong>of</strong> the Little Chef site may be considered a good use <strong>of</strong> the existing site, but exp<strong>and</strong>ing such development to<br />

the surrounding fields is not appropriate.<br />

22541 Penmaenmawr Town Council (A M Jones) [5192] 1 Object<br />

Summary The l<strong>and</strong> earmarked for employment allotment is on virgin greenfield <strong>and</strong> access would be problematic.<br />

Change Sought: There is a need to actively seek existing brownfield sites for the developments to continue.<br />

14105 Mr & Mrs Ian & Rosemary Boulton [653] 1 Object<br />

Summary I am objecting on the grounds <strong>of</strong><br />

a) this will be a serious blot on the l<strong>and</strong>scape, ruining a beautiful view.<br />

b) this will be encroaching on green fields.<br />

c) this will be detrimental to wildlife / loss <strong>of</strong> habitat for wildlife.<br />

d)as there is no access to the site from the west, ie Anglesey or Bangor; it will mean unacceptable amounts <strong>of</strong> traffic through the village, the roads are<br />

certainly not up to this <strong>and</strong> it will be an accident waiting to happen.<br />

e)We live in close proximity to the proposed site <strong>and</strong> have NOT been consulted<br />

Change Sought: Delete site.<br />

1002

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!