Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES
4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, The Woodland
Rep No Name People Type
19298 Bodysgallen Hall & Spa (Mr Matthew Johnson) [4548] 1 Object
Summary It is contended that the development of this greenfield site for housing would be contrary to national planning policies, It is also contended that the proposed
contingency allocation is not realistic and appropriate having regard to the alternatives.
Change Sought: We request deletion of the contingency allocation from the plan. We are not suggesting a replacement since we contend that a review of the plan would be
the best way of dealing with a situation in which the plan strategy is being compromised.
14495 The National Trust (Mr Chris Lambart) [872] 1 Object
Summary Weaknesses of the contingency allocation approach identified in the Sustainability Appraisal support our view that once a site is identified as a contingency
allocation, development becomes inevitable
Development would harm the setting of the grade I registered historic park and garden at Bodysgallen and could harm the setting of the World Heritage Site.
It would also have landscape and biodiversity impacts.
Development of this greenfield site for housing would be contrary to national planning policies. The proposed contingency allocation is not realistic and
appropriate having regard to the alternatives. Timely plan review (now mandatory) removes the need for contingency allocations.
Change Sought: We request deletion of the contingency allocation from the plan. We are not suggesting a replacement since we contend that a review of the plan would be
the best way of dealing with a situation in which the plan strategy is being compromised
13933 Christine & Becky Shaw [4095] 1 Object
Summary I object as follows:
The fields in question are part of a working farm and is valuable grazing land and vitally important agricultural land.
A great deal of overdevelopment has already taken place causing problems with access and traffic.
The fields have been subject to flooding in heavy rain.
There has to be a limit to the amount of houses that can be built in one area and green fields are essential to our quality of life.
Change Sought: Delete site.
14094 Mr & Mrs Denys & Krystyna Morgan [4173] 1 Object
Summary We object as follows:
It seems to us that the Marl ward has already contributed more than enough of its precious, green recources, to current construction projects; and the areas
form part of the last significant green zone separating Llandudno from neighbouring communities.
The area in question is a working farm, the loss of which would also constitute a loss the community as a whole. It is also an extensive and important part of
the natural drainage of the area.
The Marl ward is still, just, semi rural.
Change Sought: Delete site.
14090 Mr Colin Halliwell [4170] 1 Object
Summary I object on the following grounds:
The Marl ward has already been the subject of extensive development.
Historic, green field, agricultural land is in short supply.
The proposed development would also considerably reduce the separation zone.
The area is part of a working farm.
This will place additional stress on the ability of the existing surface water drainage infrastructure.
Existing established properties will be devalued.
Additional traffic will be added to principal traffic routes that are already suffering from the over development.
Change Sought: Delete site.
14076 Mr Alastair Deane [4164] 1 Object
Summary I object on the following grounds.
This land is of a separate zone giving green space between communities
Over development in this area in recent years by Anwyl Wimpey & McBride builders
Traffic implications for both Marl Lane and Pentywyn Road juction
Historic landscapes will be lost forever
This land is part of a working farm giving the local community the chance to see animals and crops on there door step.
Drainage is a major concern to residents of Tan Refail
Change Sought: Delete site.
14073 Cllr Mike Priestley [4162] 1 Object
Summary I would like to strongly object to the above 2 sites being included on the reserve list of the LDP on the grounds of:
Overdevelopment of the Marl Ward (We have permission for over 360 dwellings already)
Highway issues of these 2 sites
Drainage issues
Loss of Green fields
We have a deficit of green space in Llandudno Junction
These sites are Part of our Historic landscape and need protecting
Change Sought: Delete site.
13941 Ms Jane Jones [4099] 1 Object
Summary Marl Lane is already overdeveloped, this land is part of our heritage.
Change Sought: Delete site.
14146 S J Thorn [4270] 1 Object
Summary We object as follows:
Marl has already contributed land to meet the local housing need.
There aren't many green spaces left to enjoy.
Part of our heritage and needs to be protected.
Used for farming.
Further development would be excessive and extreme.
Roads not suitable and were not constructed for more traffic.
The land opposite Marl Lane is prone to flooding.
Change Sought: Delete site.
822