Llandudno and Llandudno Junction Register of Site Allocation

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES
4.2.2 Housing Strategy Statement, Policy HOU/1 MEETING THE HOUSING NEED, Land South of Siamber Wen, Abergele
Rep No Name People Type
17963 G Rothwell [2454] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
19978 Mr Thomas Ronald Wade [1203] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
19395 L Grimes-Thomas [2410] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site.
19541 Mrs Wendy Bainbridge [1971] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
18414 Mrs Karen Beck [2373] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
18007 Mr Stuart Lawson [2537] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
18370 Mr Gordon Leech [1963] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
18403 D Woodhouse [2372] 1 Object
Summary Parts of the site are at risk of flooding, lie adjacent to watercourses with significant ecological interest (otters and other species) and may comprise the best
and most versatile land protected from development by national planning policies.
No agricultural impact assessment has been undertaken. Archaeological potential has been identified but no known assessment is available for review.
The site is peripheral to the town, in an area of sensitive landscape quality which positively contribute to its setting.
Access will be principally car-borne with poor linkages by other modes with unacceptable impacts on the movements in town.
Change Sought: Deletion of site
22411 Environment Agency Wales (Mrs Deborah Hemsworth) [1036] 1 Object
Summary Sites 78,MS20 and 79/80 have a small area of C2 and site 79/80 has a significant potion of the north of the site in C1. With sites affected by the C2 zone, it
states that no development will tak place immediately adjacent to the river. However, no work has been submitted which demonstrates that climate change
has been considered for the lifetime of the development. The limit of the flood plain area may extend further into the site once this allowance has been
considered.
Change Sought: Further work to determine where this limit should lie needs to be undertaken.
460